Airlines
Emirates A380 superjumbo was damaged by a ground vehicle in Moscow
In a startling incident at Moscow Domodedovo Airport, an Emirates Airbus A380, one of the largest passenger aircraft in the world, encountered significant damage as it prepared for departure.
The mishap unfolded on a Wednesday afternoon when a pushback tug found itself wedged beneath the colossal double-deck aircraft.
Photographs circulated on social media platforms depicted the vivid yellow pushback truck ensnared under the belly of the A380, indicating the severity of the situation. The unfortunate incident, as per RadarBox data, unfolded mere hours prior, during the preparation for flight EK133 from Dubai to Moscow, operated by the aircraft with registration A6-EDM.
Thankfully, the aircraft had not yet welcomed passengers on board, as it awaited departure scheduled for 16:35 local time.emirates flights However, the faced postponement and eventual cancellation due to the damage sustained. The underbody of the airbus a380 emirates
bore notable harm, necessitating extensive repairs before it could resume service.
Emirates promptly responded to the incident, ensuring the safety and convenience of its passengers. A spokesperson for the airline conveyed, “ek flight EK134 has been cancelled due to a ground services vehicle making contact with the aircraft prior to passengers boarding.” Additionally, affected passengers were swiftly rebooked on alternative Emirates flights, assuring minimal disruption to their travel plans.
The statement issued by emirates air line underscored their commitment to passenger and crew safety, reiterating that the well-being of all involved remains paramount. While the setback in Moscow may cause inconvenience, Emirates assures passengers that steps are being taken to rectify the situation and resume normal operations swiftly.
Airlines
Federal Court Imposes $100M Fine on Qantas for “Ghost Flights” Scandal
In a major ruling, the Federal Court has confirmed a hefty A$100 million penalty against Qantas for its involvement in the “ghost flights” scandal. As reported by FlightGlobal.
The court found that Qantas misled consumers by offering and selling tickets for flights that the airline had already decided to cancel. Adding to the controversy, Qantas failed to promptly notify ticket holders about these cancellations.
The penalty follows Qantas’ admission of violating the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). The airline agreed with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) on the penalty amount, aiming to deter Qantas and other businesses from similar breaches in the future.
Embraer Opens Applications for 2025 Software and Data Science Training Initiative
The ACCC emphasized that this substantial fine sends a clear message: misleading customers will lead to serious consequences, regardless of a company’s size. In addition to the penalty, Qantas has committed to paying approximately A$20 million to affected passengers who unknowingly purchased tickets for canceled flights.
This compensation comes on top of any refunds or alternative flight arrangements already provided. ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb praised the penalty, underscoring the importance of robust compliance programs red energy qantas in large corporations like Qantas.
She pointed out that Qantas has since made changes to its operating and scheduling procedures to prevent similar issues in the future.
-
Aviation2 months ago
New EU Carry-On Rules Begin September 2024: What to Expect
-
Aviation1 month ago
Boeing confirms 797: A New Era for Mid-Size Aircraft
-
Aviation1 month ago
Lockheed and Tata Team Up to Build C-130J MRO Facility in India
-
Aviation2 weeks ago
Microsoft Flight Simulator Raises $3 Million to Bring Back the An-225 Mriya
-
Tech1 month ago
China Developing Jet to Travel Anywhere in Two Hours
-
Aviation2 months ago
Meet WindRunner: The World’s Heaviest and Largest Aircraft Ever Built
-
Aviation2 months ago
Comac C919 Moves Closer to Securing EU Certification with EASA
-
Aviation2 months ago
Is HAL Planning to Fit the Rafale’s M-88 Engine into Tejas?