Connect with us

Aircraft comparison

Comparsion between Turkish T929 ATAK-II and Russia Ka-52

Comparsion between Turkish T929 ATAK-II and Russia Ka-52

The Turkish T929 ATAK-II and the Russian Ka-52 are both formidable attack helicopters that have garnered significant attention in the realm of military aviation. Representing cutting-edge technology and advanced capabilities, these rotorcraft serve as vital components of their respective nation’s aerial forces.

In this comparison, we delve into the design, performance, weaponry, and operational characteristics of Both aircraft, offering insights into their strengths, limitations, and the strategic implications of their deployment. By examining these two helicopters side by side, we gain a comprehensive understanding of their role in modern warfare and the dynamics of competition and cooperation within the global defense industry.

Turkish Aerospace Industries is developing a twin-engine, heavy assault helicopter called the TAI T929 ATAK 2. The helicopter is designed for attack, electronic warfare, and reconnaissance missions in all-weather environments in both day and night conditions.The ATAK II, which made its maiden flight on April 28, 2023, is currently in development. It is projected that the Turkish Army will receive it starting in 2025.

The Ka-52, also known as the Alligator, is a cutting-edge attack helicopter designed by Russia’s Kamov Design Bureau. It is meant to excel in a variety of roles, including reconnaissance, close air support, and anti-armor combat. It also serves as an icon of Russian helicopter engineering, demonstrating outstanding skills and versatility in combat operations.

Advertisement

The TAI T929 ATAK 2 and the Russian KA-52 are both attack helicopters designed for military purposes. Here’s a comparison between the two helicopters.

Armament: The T929 ATAK 2 is equipped with a 20mm chin-mounted cannon, air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground missiles, rockets, and guided munitions.while Ka-52 is equipped with a range of armament options, including anti-tank guided missiles, air-to-air missiles, unguided rockets, and a 30mm automatic cannon.

Engine: The Turkish T929 ATAK-II, propelled by two TV3-117 turboshaft engines, each generating 1,864.25 kW (2,500.00 hp) of power, contrasts with the Russian Ka-52, which relies on 2 × Klimov VK-2500 turboshaft engines, boasting 1,800 kW (2,400 shp) each.

In terms of dimensions, ATAK 2 is slightly smaller, with a length of 13.45 meters and a height of 3.96 meters. Whereas Ka-52 measures 16.00 meters in length and 4.93 meters in height.

Advertisement

Speed: In terms of speed, the ATAK 2 boasts a maximum speed of 318 km/h (198 mph, 172 kn), slightly surpassing the Ka-52’s maximum speed of about 310 knots (574 km/h).

However, the cruise speed of the ATAK 2 at 314 km/h (195 mph, 170 kn) is notably faster than the Ka-52’s 270 km/h (170 mph, 150 kn).

Additionally, the ATAK 2 has a maximum takeoff weight of 10,000 kg (22,046 lb), slightly lower than the Ka-52’s 10,800 kg (23,810 lb).

Finally, in terms of service ceiling, the ATAK 2 surpasses the Ka-52 with a service ceiling of 6,096 m (20,000 ft), compared to the Ka-52’s 5,500 m (18,000 ft).

Advertisement

The T929 helicopter is equipped with tandem seats, an asymmetrical weapons bay, a large capacity for ammunition, a low IR signature, a digital cockpit, ballistic protection, better avionics, and the potential to engage in electronic warfare and countermeasure operations.

The Ka-52 is equipped with a “Phazotron” cockpit radio-locator, allowing flights in adverse meteorological conditions and at night. The necessary information acquired by this radio-locator is transferred to the cockpit’s multi-functional display screen. The Ka-52 has a self-defense package that comprises flares and chaff to deflect incoming missiles, radar and laser warning systems, and other defenses. 

The initiation of the T929 ATAK II’s development gained significant momentum in 2019, driven by the vision of providing Turkey with its own helicopter tailored for the national army. Beyond serving domestic needs, the helicopter has now emerged as a potential export asset. This newfound global appeal is particularly noteworthy as the T929 ATAK II competes with high-cost American rotorcraft, positioning itself as a competitive and cost-effective alternative in the international market.

KA-52 helicopter is the only one in the world having a certain technologically advanced feature that is not offered by any other helicopter. A pilot ejection device is also equipped with this helicopter in case of an emergency landing or collision. The seats are equipped with rocket-assisted ejection systems, and each crew member has a separate ejection mechanism.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Aircraft comparison

Comparison between Comac C919 and A320 aircraft

Comparison between Comac C919 and A320 aircraft

The COMAC C919 and the Airbus A320 represent two significant players in the narrow-body commercial aircraft market, each reflecting its manufacturer’s vision for the future of aviation.

The C919, developed by the Chinese aerospace manufacturer COMAC, aims to challenge established Western dominance with its advanced technology and cost-effective design. In contrast, the Airbus A320, a stalwart of global aviation for decades, continues to set benchmarks for efficiency, safety, and passenger comfort.

This comparison explores the key differences and similarities between these two aircraft, highlighting their design philosophies, performance metrics, and market implications.

How the Comac C919 similar from the A320 and B737 Max:Click here

The COMAC C919, predominantly built using aluminum alloys, is equipped with CFM International LEAP turbofan engines. It has the capacity to accommodate between 156 and 168 passengers in its standard configuration.

Advertisement

This twin-engine jet features a six-abreast economy cabin layout. Initially, it offered options for either CFM56 or IAE V2500 turbofan engines, though the CFM56/PW6000 combination was exclusively used for the A318 model. It can accommodate 195 passengers.

COMAC C919 vs. Airbus A320: A Comparative Overview


Length: The C919 measures 38.9 meters (127.6 feet) in length, slightly longer than the A320, which is 37.57 meters (123 feet 3 inches) long. This extra length provides a marginally larger cabin for the C919.

Wingspan: Both aircraft share the same wingspan of 35.8 meters (117.5 feet), indicating similar aerodynamic properties and potential for comparable fuel efficiency and performance.

Height: The C919 stands at 11.95 meters (39.2 feet) in height, surpassing the A320’s height of 11.76 meters (38 feet 7 inches). This difference is relatively minor but may impact cabin space and cargo hold configuration.

Advertisement

Aircraft comparisons between the comac C919 and B737 max 8:Click here

Weight: The COMAC C919 has a maximum takeoff weight of 42,100 kilograms (92,815 pounds), slightly less than the A320’s 42.6 tonnes (93,900 pounds). The A320’s marginally higher weight suggests it may be able to handle slightly more payload or fuel.

Range: The C919 offers a range of 4,630 kilometers (2,500 nautical miles), which is shorter compared to the A320’s range of 6,112 kilometers (3,300 nautical miles). This extended range of the A320 makes it better suited for longer routes and provides airlines with more operational flexibility.
Nearly twice as much as the $50 million that analysts predicted, comac c919 price is roughly $91 million. That is comparable to the cost of the Boeing 737-800 and the Airbus A320neo, which, as of 2021, are estimated to be $106 million and $111 million, respectively.

Continue Reading

Trending