Aviation

COMAC Unveils Plans for the C929 to Rival Airbus and Boeing

After the success of China’s first C919 aircraft, the country is setting its sights on developing a larger plane. COMAC (Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China) has officially confirmed plans to build a widebody aircraft, marking a significant step in its aircraft lineup.

Traditionally, Airbus and Boeing dominate the widebody aircraft market, with decades of expertise in developing planes and engines capable of carrying heavy payloads. China, which currently relies on imported engines, is now aiming to challenge these giants with its own widebody jet, the C929, designed to compete with the Airbus A350 and Boeing 777.

American Airlines Is Looking for Flight Attendants: Apply Now

The C929 will be China’s first independently developed long-range widebody aircraft. It adheres to international airworthiness standards and boasts independent intellectual property rights. The baseline version is designed to seat 280 passengers and offers a range of 12,000 kilometers, catering to global demand for both regional and international air travel.

Russia, which also needs reliable narrowbody and widebody aircraft, could become a key customer for the C929. Additionally, China plans to target the broader Asian market as it continues to expand its aviation capabilities.

Close Call at Heathrow: BA Flight Narrowly Escapes Drone Collision

China’s aviation progress includes the ARJ21 (now called C909), a regional jet with 100 seats for shorter routes, and the C919, a narrowbody jet with 180 seats designed to rival the Boeing 737 MAX and Airbus A320. Both models have found increasing demand in the domestic market.

At China’s largest air show in Zhuhai, COMAC announced that Air China will be the launch customer for the C929 widebody jet, though details about order size and delivery timelines were not disclosed.

Other major deals announced by COMAC include:

Hainan Airlines: Firm orders for 60 C919 and 40 C909 regional jets.
Colorful Guizhou Airlines: 30 C909 jets, with 20 firm orders and 10 provisional agreements.

The C929, renamed from the CR929 after Russia withdrew from the joint development project in 2023, is expected to carry 280–400 passengers with a range of 12,000 kilometers, competing directly with Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner.

According to COMAC’s deputy general manager, Tong Yu, the first fuselage section of the C929 is expected by September 2027, with prototype test flights anticipated soon after.

Aviation

Why Embraer’s E175-E2 Faces Challenges in the U.S. Market

Embraer, a renowned Brazilian aircraft manufacturer, has a strong reputation for building regional jets that connect smaller cities worldwide.

While its aircraft are widely used in various countries, the United States imposes restrictions on certain Embraer models, particularly the E175-E2. In this article, we’ll explore why this aircraft is blocked from entering the U.S. market.

The Embraer E175 vs. E175-E2

The E175 is allowed in the U.S. and is a popular choice for regional airlines operating short-haul routes.
The E175-E2, a more advanced and fuel-efficient version, faces restrictions due to scope clauses.

1. Scope Clause Restrictions

Scope clauses are agreements between major U.S. airlines and pilot unions that limit the size and weight of aircraft used by regional carriers.

These clauses cap the maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) at 86,000 pounds.
The E175-E2 exceeds this limit with an MTOW of 98,120 pounds (44,600 kg), making it ineligible for regional operations.

2. Fleet Compatibility

U.S. regional carriers typically operate under agreements that favor aircraft compliant with scope clauses.

The original E175 meets these criteria, making it easier to integrate into existing fleets.
The E175-E2, despite its improved efficiency and longer range, is considered incompatible with current contracts.
World’s Largest Electric Aircraft Ready for Its First Flight

3. Market Dynamics

Modifying scope clauses would require complex negotiations between airlines and pilot unions, a process that can be time-consuming and contentious.

Major airlines have shown little interest in pushing for these changes, especially with other compliant aircraft available.
The lack of demand has led Embraer to suspend the development of the E175-E2 in February 2022.

Similar Challenges Faced by Competitors

Embraer isn’t the only manufacturer affected by scope clauses.

Mitsubishi’s SpaceJet program was similarly halted in 2023 due to the same restrictions.
Larger regional aircraft like the E190-E2 (MTOW: 124,340 lbs) are also excluded from regional contracts, further limiting options.
In the U.S., airline and pilot union agreements restrict regional carriers to aircraft with a maximum of 76 seats or a maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) of 86,000 pounds (39,000 kg).
How to Avoid Flight Delays: Airline’s Guide to Smooth Travel
The Embraer E175-E2, however, exceeds these limits, offering seating for up to 90 passengers in a single-class layout and an MTOW of 98,120 pounds (44,600 kg).
Due to these restrictions, Embraer suspended the E175-E2 program in February 2022, citing scope clause limitations as the primary reason for pausing development.

The Decline of Small Regional Jets

The U.S. market is shifting away from smaller, 50-seat regional jets.

In 2019, there were 660 active 50-seat regional jets.
By November 2024, this number had dropped to 260, creating a gap in the regional aviation market that remains unfilled.

Impact on U.S. Aviation

The inability to introduce newer, more efficient regional jets like the E175-E2 is impacting both airlines and manufacturers:

U.S. airlines must adjust flight routes and seating configurations to accommodate older aircraft models.
Boeing, a domestic competitor, also faces challenges as demand shifts towards larger aircraft, reducing regional jet sales.

Conclusion

While the E175-E2 is permitted and operational in many countries, it remains blocked in the U.S. due to regulatory limitations. This situation highlights the pressures faced by domestic manufacturers and airlines as they struggle to balance efficiency, regulations, and market demands.

What do you think about these restrictions? Should the U.S. update its scope clauses to allow more advanced regional aircraft? Share your thoughts in the comments!