Connect with us

Aircraft comparison

Mega Comparison of Boeing 777x vs A350-1000 Aircraft

Mega Comparison of Boeing 777x vs A350-1000 Aircraft

The Boeing 777X and Airbus A350 are cutting-edge wide-body aircraft renowned for their advanced technology and reduced carbon emissions engines, marking them as flagship models of 21st-century aviation. Each aircraft offers unique capabilities and performance advantages.

Boeing’s 777X represents the latest evolution in the long-range, twin-engine Boeing 777 family. Notably, it incorporates innovative folding wingtips, optimizing efficiency during flight and enabling access to a broader range of airports.

Advertisement

On the other hand, the Airbus A350-1000 is a long-range, wide-body twin-engine airliner developed by Airbus, distinguished by its extensive use of composite materials comprising 53% of its structure. These materials contribute to its lighter weight and enhanced durability compared to traditional aluminium constructions.

Comparison of B777x and A350-1000

Length: The Boeing 777-9 measures approximately 251 feet 9 inches, while the Airbus A350-1000 has a length of 242.1 feet.

Advertisement

Wingspan: The Boeing 777-9 boasts a wingspan of 235.5 feet, compared to the Airbus A350-1000’s 212.43 feet.

Height: The height of the Boeing 777-9 is 64.7 feet, whereas the Airbus A350-1000 stands at 56 feet.

Advertisement

Cabin Width: Inside, the Boeing 777-9 offers a cabin width of around 19.7 feet, slightly wider than the Airbus A350-1000’s 18.5 feet.

Maximum Takeoff Weight: The Boeing 777-9 can take off with a maximum weight of 351.5 tons, while the Airbus A350-1000’s maximum takeoff weight is 316 tons.

Advertisement

Maximum Payload: The Boeing 777-9 can carry a maximum payload of 73.5 tons, compared to the Airbus A350-1000’s 68 tons.

Fuel Capacity: The Boeing 777-9 has a fuel capacity of 158.9 tons, significantly higher than the Airbus A350-1000’s 124.65 tons, allowing for a 34-ton advantage in fuel storage.

Advertisement

Range: The Airbus A350-1000 excels in range, capable of flying up to 16,100 km, whereas the Boeing 777-9 has a range of up to 13,500 km.

Cost: The Airbus A350-1000 is priced at approximately $366.5 million, while the Boeing 777-9 is marketed at $442.2 million, with the smaller 777-8 variant priced at $410.2 million.

Advertisement

When comparing the a350 vs 777x , both showcase cutting-edge technologies that define modern long-range aircraft.

Why LATAM retired its entire A350s fleet?Read more

Advertisement

The Boeing 777X employs advanced composite materials extensively in its wings, boasting the longest span of any commercial passenger airplane. Its unique feature of folding wingtips enhances operational flexibility in constrained airport spaces.

Powered by the powerful and efficient GE9X engine, tailored specifically for this model, the 777X benefits from superior aerodynamics that optimize fuel efficiency. Inside, the cabin draws inspiration from the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, offering wider windows, enhanced pressurization, mood lighting, and ergonomic design.

Advertisement

In contrast, the Airbus A350-1000 entered service in 2015 with Qatar Airways as its launch customer, incorporating 53% composite materials in its construction for reduced weight and increased strength over traditional aluminium.

Airbus A350-1000 now suitable for 480 Passengers:Read more

Advertisement

The A350’s wings incorporate natural-inspired flexing motions during flight to minimize drag and improve fuel efficiency subtly. airbus a350 vs boeing 777 it is equipped with Rolls-Royce Trent XWB engines known for their quietness and fuel efficiency, contributing to a quieter cabin environment.

Utilizing advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Airbus has optimized the A350’s aerodynamics, further reducing drag and enhancing overall efficiency.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Aircraft comparison

Comparison of India’s AMCA and American F 35

Comparison of India's AMCA and American F 35

In the evolving realm of advanced military aviation, the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) from India and the F-35 Lightning II from the United States stand as key symbols of their respective nations’ ambitions.

The AMCA, still in the development phase, embodies India’s strategic vision for a homegrown, cutting-edge fighter jet designed to meet future combat challenges. On the other hand, the F-35, an already operational marvel of American aerospace engineering, has set the standard for modern stealth and multi-role versatility.

Advertisement

Comparison of Russian Su30 and France built Rafale fighter jet

“In this comparison, we will delve into the two different fighters, the AMCA and the F-35, examining their technological innovations, strategic roles, and potential impacts on global air combat dynamics.”

The Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) is an advanced Indian fighter jet, featuring a single-seat, twin-engine design with all-weather capabilities and fifth-generation stealth technology. It is being developed for both the Indian Air Force and the Indian Navy, aiming to enhance India’s combat prowess with its multirole versatility.

Advertisement

In contrast, the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II represents an American family of single-seat, single-engine stealth aircraft, known for its air superiority and strike mission capabilities. The F-35 also excels in electronic warfare and offers advanced intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance functions.

Length:

Advertisement
  • The AMCA measures 17.6 meters (57 feet ) in length, while the F-35A is slightly shorter at 15.7 meters (51.4 feet).

Height:

  • The AMCA stands at 4.5 meters (14 feet 9 inches) in height, whereas the F-35A is marginally taller at 4.4 meters (14.4 feet).

Wing Area:

  • The AMCA’s wing area is 55 square meters (590 square feet), whereas the F-35A has a significantly larger wing area of 43 square meters (460 square feet).

Empty Weight:

  • The AMCA has an estimated empty weight of 12,000 kilograms (26,455 pounds), while the F-35A’s empty weight is 13,290 kilograms (29,300 pounds).

Maximum Takeoff Weight:

  • The AMCA’s estimated maximum takeoff weight is 25,000 kilograms (55,116 pounds), compared to the F-35A’s maximum takeoff weight of 29,900 kilograms (65,918 pounds).

Fuel Capacity:

  • The AMCA has a fuel capacity of 6,500 kilograms (14,300 pounds), while the F-35A carries 8,278 kilograms (18,250 pounds) of internal fuel.

Maximum Speed:

  • The AMCA can achieve a maximum speed of Mach 2.15 (2,600 km/h or 1,600 mph), whereas the F-35A reaches a maximum speed of Mach 1.6 at high altitude and Mach 1.06 (700 knots or 806 mph) at sea level.

Range:

  • The AMCA boasts a ferry range of 5,324 kilometers (3,308 miles) and a combat range of 1,620 kilometers (1,010 miles). In comparison, the F-35A has a range of 2,800 kilometers (1,700 miles) and a combat range of 1,410 kilometers (870 miles) in air-to-air configuration.

Service Ceiling:

The AMCA can reach a service ceiling of 20,000 meters (65,000 feet), while the F-35A operates up to 15,000 meters (50,000 feet).

In a bold step towards innovation, India’s Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program is set to revolutionize its production process with 3D printing technology. By integrating 3D printing, HAL anticipates substantial benefits ranging from cost reduction and faster turnaround times to optimized material usage. The adoption of 3D printing not only promises to streamline production but also offers opportunities to mitigate material waste, a critical challenge in aerospace manufacturing.

Advertisement

The F-35 A design is robust; in contrast to its 8,000-hour design life, its service life has been evaluated to reach 24,000 hours. The F-35A has an extremely low radar cross-section, at 3.8mm, which reduces its radar profile. Multiple software and processor updates have been made to the F-35A. Progress includes improved weapon capability and electronic warfare systems. The current version, known as Block 3F baseline, is moving towards Block 4, with software and weapon improvements planned twice yearly in 2024.

The AMCA is currently being developed and will have sophisticated avionics, including an electronic pilot function. A fighter platform typically needs two pilots. One is a pilot who flies, while the other is a mission pilot (who directs the flying pilot). Only one cockpit and an electronic pilot will be present on this jet. As a way to improve situational awareness and collaborate with the advanced electronic warfare (EW) suite onboard the AMCA, distributed passive sensors with AI-assisted multi-sensor data fusion are anticipated.

Advertisement

The F-35 Lightning II features a single-seat cockpit with advanced automation and AI, enabling the pilot to handle both flying and mission-critical tasks. Its Distributed Aperture System (DAS) offers a 360-degree view, enhancing situational awareness. Supported by an advanced electronic warfare suite, the F-35’s AI-driven sensor fusion integrates data from various sensors, providing a complete battlefield picture. This technology reduces the pilot’s workload and significantly boosts the aircraft’s combat effectiveness.

since HAL realised the primary goals and advancements needed for AMCA for future aviation projects when constructing aircraft. In collaboration with international suppliers and via innovative research for newer weapons, the Defense is advancing its weaponry. The Brahmos air-to-ground missile, ASTRA, RUDRAM, Laser guided, and precision munition pods will all be made available by the AMCA. Radar and infrared search and tracking features are some additional elements that aid aircraft detection.

Advertisement

The F-35 features two internal weapon bays and four weapon stations. There are air-to-air missiles at the two inboard weapon stations. Among the air-to-surface weapons for the outboard station are the Joint Direct Attack Munition, the Paveway line of bombs, the Joint Standoff Weapon, and cluster munitions. The AIM-9X or AIM-132 ASRAAMs can be mounted on either of the wingtip pylons, which are canted outward to lower the radar cross-section.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending