Aircraft comparison

Is India’s Su-30 is better than Pakistan’s F16. which is better?

The F-16 Fighting Falcon and the Su-30 Flanker are two renowned fighter jets used by various air forces worldwide. The F-16, crafted by the United States, is famed for its agility, state-of-the-art avionics, and versatility in both air-to-air and air-to-ground operations.

In contrast, the Russian-designed Su-30 excels with its superior range, powerful engines, and exceptional maneuverability, making it a formidable opponent in air superiority roles. Both aircraft showcase the pinnacle of military aviation technology, reflecting their respective countries’ design philosophies and combat strategies.

The General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon is an American single-engine, supersonic multirole fighter aircraft. It made its maiden flight in January 1974 and was introduced into the USAF in August 1978. The F-16 features a frameless bubble canopy for improved cockpit visibility, a side-mounted control stick for easier handling during maneuvers, and an ejection seat reclined 30 degrees from vertical. As of 2023, it is the most widely used fixed-wing aircraft in military service globally, with 2,145 F-16s in operation.

The Sukhoi Su-30 is a twin-engine, supermaneuverable fighter aircraft with a two-seat cockpit and an airbrake located behind the canopy. It is versatile, capable of functioning both as an air superiority fighter and a strike fighter. The Indian Air Force (IAF) is currently considering extending the operational life of its Su-30 MKI fighter jets, which have been in service for over two decades.

Length: The F-16 has a length of 49 feet 5 inches (15.06 meters), while the Su-30 measures 72 feet (21.935 meters), making it notably longer.

Height: Standing at 16 feet (4.9 meters), the F-16 is shorter than the Su-30, which has a height of 20 feet 10 inches (6.36 meters).

Range: The F-16 boasts a combat range of 295 nautical miles (339 miles, 546 kilometers), whereas the Su-30 extends its range to 3,000 kilometers (1,900 miles, 1,600 nautical miles) at high altitude, emphasizing its longer operational reach.

Engine: The F-16 is powered by a single General Electric F110-GE-129 engine, generating up to 29,500 pounds of thrust with afterburner. In contrast, the Su-30 utilizes twin Saturn AL-31FL/FP afterburning turbofan engines, each capable of producing 27,560 pounds of thrust with afterburner. While the F-16 relies on a single engine, the Su-30 benefits from dual engines, enhancing its power and redundancy in flight.

Speed: At high altitude, the F-16 achieves a maximum speed of Mach 2.05 (1,353 mph), whereas the Su-30 matches this with a maximum speed of Mach 2 (1,320 mph, 1,140 knots).

Service Ceiling: The F-16 reaches a service ceiling of 50,000 feet (15,000 meters), whereas the Su-30’s service ceiling stands at 56,800 feet (17,300 meters), providing superior operational altitude capability.

Fuel Capacity: Internally, the F-16 can carry 7,000 pounds (3,200 kg) of fuel, whereas the Su-30 accommodates 9,400 kg (20,723 lb) internally, indicating a larger fuel capacity for extended missions.

Gross Weight: The F-16 has a maximum takeoff weight of 42,300 pounds (19,187 kg), while the Su-30 can take off at a maximum weight of 34,500 kg (76,059 lb).

Empty Weight: The F-16’s empty weight is 18,900 pounds (8,573 kg), lighter than the Su-30 which weighs 17,700 kg (39,022 lb) when empty.

The Su-30 is renowned for its robust airframe, exceptional maneuverability in all axes, and its iconic “cobra” maneuver. The tactical effectiveness of the cobra maneuver has been a topic of debate for decades, with no clarity its practical application. Designed originally for ground-attack roles, the series incorporates features such as canards, thrust-vectoring engines, and a long-range phased-array radar to excel in air-superiority missions.

Ukraine is anticipated to receive its first batch of F-16s this summer. Russian military expert from the US-based Institute remarked that using American-made fighter jets for offensive strikes into Russia currently lacks strong military justification.

Israeli F-16s have demonstrated superior performance over Su-30s due to enhanced pilot training, cohesive group tactics, and extensive combat experience. In contrast, Ukrainian pilots, historically trained in Russian combat doctrines, face challenges in achieving similar proficiency levels, exacerbated by comparatively limited exposure to sustained combat scenarios.

Aircraft comparison

Comparison of the C130J vs C295 cargo aircraft

The Airbus C295 and Lockheed Martin C-130J are two of the most versatile military transport aircraft, each known for its unique strengths across various missions.

While both aircraft are highly capable in transporting troops, cargo, and performing specialized missions, they cater to different operational needs based on their size, capacity, range, and adaptability.

In this comparison, we will delve into the specifications, performance, and operational advantages of the C295 and C-130J, providing insights to help evaluate their suitability for modern military and logistical challenges.

Air India Might Operate Tata-Made New Airbus C295 Aircraft

The Airbus C295 is designed with a focus on short take-off and landing (STOL) capabilities, making it highly effective for regional and remote area transport. This STOL ability allows it to operate from shorter, less-prepared runways, ideal for accessing challenging locations.

In contrast, the Lockheed Martin C-130J prioritizes a larger payload capacity and greater range, enabling it to carry more cargo over longer distances, which is essential for strategic operations. This extended range and load capability make the C-130J well-suited for larger, more demanding missions requiring heavy transport and extended reach.

Here is the Specification of both aircraft.

Length: The Airbus C-295 measures 24.46 meters (80 feet 3 inches) in length, while the Lockheed Martin C-130J is significantly longer at 29.79 meters (97 feet 9 inches).

Max Takeoff Weight: The C-295 has a maximum takeoff weight of 21,000 kg (46,297 lb) for normal operations and 23,200 kg (51,147 lb) for overload. In contrast, the C-130J has a significantly higher maximum takeoff weight of 70,307 kg (155,000 lb).

Fuel Capacity: The C-295 has a fuel capacity of 7,650 liters (2,020 US gallons) and offers an optional in-flight refueling probe. The C-130J, while specific capacity details are not listed, can carry larger amounts of fuel to support its extended range.

Powerplant: The C-295 is powered by two Pratt & Whitney Canada PW127G turboprop engines, providing 1,972 kW (2,644 hp) each, while the C-130J features four Rolls-Royce AE 2100D3 turboprop engines, delivering 3,458 kW (4,637 shp) each.

Range: The C-295 has a normal payload range of 1,555 km (966 miles), whereas the C-130J boasts a maximum range of 3,300 km (2,100 miles) with a normal payload of 15,422 kg (34,000 lb).

Hardpoints: The C-295 features six hardpoints for carrying additional payloads, with a maximum capacity of 800 kg (1,764 lb) on inboard pylons. The C-130J is equipped with six wing hardpoints that allow it to carry extra fuel tanks, sensors, and a variety of weapons, making it more versatile for both cargo and combat roles.

Propellers: The C-295 uses six-bladed Hamilton Sundstrand HS-568F-5 composite propellers, while the C-130J is equipped with six-bladed Dowty R391 composite constant-speed propellers that feature fully feathering and reversible pitch capabilities.

The C295 is equipped with advanced avionics and navigation systems, including a digital cockpit with modern displays and controls, and an integrated mission system for surveillance and communication tasks.

The C-130J Hercules is equipped with advanced avionics and navigation systems as well. It features a modern glass cockpit with digital displays and controls, enhancing situational awareness for the crew. The aircraft includes an integrated mission system that supports various tasks, such as aerial refueling, cargo management, and tactical operations. Additionally, its advanced communication systems ensure reliable connectivity during missions, making it effective for both military and humanitarian operations.

Airbus Final Assembly Line Adapts for A350 Freighter Production

Recently, Airbus inaugurated a Final Assembly Line (FAL) for the C295 aircraft in Vadodara, Gujarat, as part of the ‘Make in India’ initiative. This project aims to deliver 56 C295 aircraft to the Indian Air Force (IAF), with 40 units being manufactured locally and 16 delivered from Spain. So far, six aircraft have already been delivered.

Meanwhile, Lockheed Martin has partnered with Tata Advanced Systems to strengthen support for India’s C-130J Super Hercules fleet. This collaboration aims to set up a Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) hub in India and increase local production of C-130J units, pending approval from the US and Indian governments.

The C-295 has been acquired by several countries, including India, Spain, Egypt, Poland, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, and Portugal, with a total of 225 units built. In comparison, as of March 2022, 500 C-130J aircraft have been delivered to 26 operators across 22 countries.