Connect with us

Aerospace

How does the ATR-42 water crash land in comparison to the A320 and B737?

This might be the main factor in the 19 people being trapped under the aircraft. #PrecisionAir #Crash #ATR42-500

How does the ATR-42 water crash land in comparison to the A320 and B737?

A passenger plane flight PW-494 from Tanzania crashed into Lake Victoria as it attempted to land in the lakeside town of Bukoba, killing at least 19 of its passengers. When the accident happened at roughly 08:53 local time, the ATR42-500, 5H-PWF, was en route from Dar es Salaam to Bukoba. The flight carried 39 passengers (38 Adults and 1 Infant) together with 4 crew members. The families and relatives of the passengers and crew members who were engaged in this unfortunate tragedy are offered the utmost sympathy by Precision Air.

10 things about Boeing 737 max aircraft.(Opens in a new browser tab)

The incident took place today during a flight over Mwanza from Dar es Salaam (DAR) to Bukoba (BKZ) (MWZ). On the 640-mile journey, the first flight travelled 529 miles, and the second, 111. There were 39 passengers and four crew members among the 43 people in the aeroplane (the ATR 42-500 has a capacity for 48 passengers). The airline operates about 10 ATR turboprops, including the ATR 42 and ATR 72.

Since the Precision Air ATR 42-500 crashed just a few hundred feet from land, local fishermen and rescue workers have been frantically trying to save all on board. Unluckily, 19 of the 43 passengers have been officially pronounced dead, with several of them still trapped within the plane. Tragedies like this serve as a warning that anything can go catastrophically wrong even though flying is incredibly safe. Sadly heartbreaking.

Advertisement

How should I proceed if an aircraft is about to crash? (Opens in a new browser tab)

How does the ATR-42 crash land in comparison to the A320 and B737?

Due to severe weather, Precision Air’s ATR 42-500 overshot the runway and ditched in the lake during the approach. However, there are various technical reasons why some of the passengers can’t escape right away. In this article, we’ll discuss how landing on an ATR 42 differs from landing on an A320 or B737.

In an aircraft, the wing configuration is crucial. Low-wing mounting is used on the A320 and B737 at or below the fuselage’s bottom. This means that if an aircraft is approached appropriately on the water surface, there will be adequate room to open the door and people can evacuate as soon as feasible. It is also conceivable for a crashed aircraft to float for a period of time due to the wing size sharing on the water surface.

US Airways Flight 1549

If remember correctly, US Airways Flight 1549’s Airbus A320 hit a flock of birds shortly after takeoff from New York and lost all engine power. Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles guided the plane to a ditch in the Hudson River close to Midtown Manhattan since they were unable to make an emergency landing at any airport due to their low altitude. Only a small number of the 155 people sustained serious injuries since nearby boats were able to save everyone.
The ATR aircraft’s turboprop engines are mostly used for regional connectivity. Compared to other jets like the A320, B737, or E170 series, this aircraft can take off and land on a shorter runway because of its design. The shape and style of an aircraft’s wings might increase survival chances. ATR 42-500 from Precision Air On the upper fuselage, it is mounted with a high wing. relates to a wing positioned on a protrusion (like the cabin roof) over the top of the main fuselage, as opposed to the shoulder wing. In this scenario, as the aircraft sinks in the water due to the weight of the wings and the engines, the fuselage will sink but the wings will float for a while. One of the biggest risks is attempting to open the door because of the water pressure; furthermore, emergency windows are opened from the inside of the aircraft instead of the outside.
however, there is still room to open the emergency window door. However, if it does, water may start to enter the cabin because of the lower atmospheric pressure, which could quickly cause the aircraft to become submerged in water. Since the ATR aeroplane is ditched to water, it will be difficult for anyone to escape. The only thing that can make evacuations successful is pre-flight preparation ditching.
It would be excellent if the ATR could adjust the cabin roof with the door latch open during the water landing scene to assist passengers from the aircraft’s top roof. That is the only way the evacuation of this aeroplane could be done best.

The 19 passengers who are trapped in the aircraft may be affected significantly by this reason.

Even if the aircraft doors are opened, there are still a lot of chances that they are locked, giving passengers time to flee before the cabin is submerged. The majority of the passengers in the Precision Air ATR 42-500 were trapped inside, and neighbouring fishermen were desperately trying to save them. However, they did a great job at evacuating the passengers, and some of them eventually emerged and entered the boats.
Authorities have been working to pull the plane out of the water and move it closer to land in addition to attempting to evacuate the passengers. The tail was the only portion of the fuselage that was ever visible. The rescue efforts have caused the jet to partially climb out of the water. One thousand people used ropes to tie a rope to the tail of the aeroplane and pull it out of the water.
According to the Wikipedia source, the ATR42 reported 12 crashes, including the Precision Air ATR 42-500 water landing crash, which was a first of its kind. The manufacturer of ATR aircraft has displayed a demonstration film for the evacuation procedure. It is crucial that the passengers and the crew get ready for the crash landing and aftermath.
When an aeroplane tries to land because of terrible weather, it might not be aware that it could overrun the runway and land on water. The crew will have adequate time to prepare for a crash landing if they are fully aware of the situation. Although the Precision Air ATR 42-500 pilots successfully controlled the landing, they were unable to evacuate the wreckage. Investigations will eventually uncover the complete details of what specifically led to the aircraft’s crash landing.
what do you think about the Precision Air ATR 42-500 crash Post a comment and let us know.
Advertisement

Aerospace

Boeing Transfers Rocket Stage to NASA, Paving Way for Human Moon Mission

Boeing Transfers Rocket Stage to NASA, Paving Way for Human Moon Mission
Image:Boeing

Boeing has achieved a significant milestone by providing NASA with the second core stage of the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket.

This crucial component, crafted at NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF), is set to propel the Artemis II crew into lunar orbit, marking humanity’s return to deep space after a 50-year hiatus.

The monumental Boeing-built rocket stage, the largest element of the Artemis II mission, will embark on a journey aboard the Pegasus barge, traveling 900 miles to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center.

Comparison of two legendary aircraft B777x vs B747 aircraft:Click here

Upon arrival, it will be meticulously integrated with other essential Artemis II components, including the upper stage, solid rocket boosters, and NASA’s Orion spacecraft within the iconic Vehicle Assembly Building. This intricate integration process is a vital step toward the eagerly anticipated Artemis II launch, slated for 2025.

Advertisement

Boeing-built products helped land humankind on the moon in 1969, and we’re proud to continue that legacy through the Artemis generation,” remarked Dave Dutcher, vice president and program manager for Boeing’s SLS program. “Together, with NASA and our industry partners and suppliers, we are building the world’s most capable rocket and paving the way to deep space through America’s rocket factory in New Orleans.”

NASA, Lockheed Martin Reveal X-59 Quiet Supersonic Aircraft:Click here

The delivery of Core Stage 2 marks a significant achievement in the evolution of the SLS rocket. Towering over 200 feet and powered by four RS-25 engines, this core stage, coupled with two solid-fueled booster rockets, will generate a staggering 8.8 million pounds of thrust. This immense power is crucial to launching Artemis II and future missions into the vast expanse of space.

The SLS rocket stands unparalleled in its capability to transport both crew and substantial cargo to the moon and beyond in a single launch. Its extraordinary capacity will facilitate the delivery of human-rated spacecraft, habitats, and scientific missions to destinations including the moon and Mars, ushering in a new era of space exploration.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending