Connect with us

Aerospace

How does the ATR-42 water crash land in comparison to the A320 and B737?

This might be the main factor in the 19 people being trapped under the aircraft. #PrecisionAir #Crash #ATR42-500

How does the ATR-42 water crash land in comparison to the A320 and B737?

A passenger plane flight PW-494 from Tanzania crashed into Lake Victoria as it attempted to land in the lakeside town of Bukoba, killing at least 19 of its passengers. When the accident happened at roughly 08:53 local time, the ATR42-500, 5H-PWF, was en route from Dar es Salaam to Bukoba. The flight carried 39 passengers (38 Adults and 1 Infant) together with 4 crew members. The families and relatives of the passengers and crew members who were engaged in this unfortunate tragedy are offered the utmost sympathy by Precision Air.

10 things about Boeing 737 max aircraft.(Opens in a new browser tab)

Advertisement

The incident took place today during a flight over Mwanza from Dar es Salaam (DAR) to Bukoba (BKZ) (MWZ). On the 640-mile journey, the first flight travelled 529 miles, and the second, 111. There were 39 passengers and four crew members among the 43 people in the aeroplane (the ATR 42-500 has a capacity for 48 passengers). The airline operates about 10 ATR turboprops, including the ATR 42 and ATR 72.

Since the Precision Air ATR 42-500 crashed just a few hundred feet from land, local fishermen and rescue workers have been frantically trying to save all on board. Unluckily, 19 of the 43 passengers have been officially pronounced dead, with several of them still trapped within the plane. Tragedies like this serve as a warning that anything can go catastrophically wrong even though flying is incredibly safe. Sadly heartbreaking.

Advertisement

How should I proceed if an aircraft is about to crash? (Opens in a new browser tab)

How does the ATR-42 crash land in comparison to the A320 and B737?

Due to severe weather, Precision Air’s ATR 42-500 overshot the runway and ditched in the lake during the approach. However, there are various technical reasons why some of the passengers can’t escape right away. In this article, we’ll discuss how landing on an ATR 42 differs from landing on an A320 or B737.

Advertisement
In an aircraft, the wing configuration is crucial. Low-wing mounting is used on the A320 and B737 at or below the fuselage’s bottom. This means that if an aircraft is approached appropriately on the water surface, there will be adequate room to open the door and people can evacuate as soon as feasible. It is also conceivable for a crashed aircraft to float for a period of time due to the wing size sharing on the water surface.

US Airways Flight 1549

If remember correctly, US Airways Flight 1549’s Airbus A320 hit a flock of birds shortly after takeoff from New York and lost all engine power. Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles guided the plane to a ditch in the Hudson River close to Midtown Manhattan since they were unable to make an emergency landing at any airport due to their low altitude. Only a small number of the 155 people sustained serious injuries since nearby boats were able to save everyone.
The ATR aircraft’s turboprop engines are mostly used for regional connectivity. Compared to other jets like the A320, B737, or E170 series, this aircraft can take off and land on a shorter runway because of its design. The shape and style of an aircraft’s wings might increase survival chances. ATR 42-500 from Precision Air On the upper fuselage, it is mounted with a high wing. relates to a wing positioned on a protrusion (like the cabin roof) over the top of the main fuselage, as opposed to the shoulder wing. In this scenario, as the aircraft sinks in the water due to the weight of the wings and the engines, the fuselage will sink but the wings will float for a while. One of the biggest risks is attempting to open the door because of the water pressure; furthermore, emergency windows are opened from the inside of the aircraft instead of the outside.
however, there is still room to open the emergency window door. However, if it does, water may start to enter the cabin because of the lower atmospheric pressure, which could quickly cause the aircraft to become submerged in water. Since the ATR aeroplane is ditched to water, it will be difficult for anyone to escape. The only thing that can make evacuations successful is pre-flight preparation ditching.
It would be excellent if the ATR could adjust the cabin roof with the door latch open during the water landing scene to assist passengers from the aircraft’s top roof. That is the only way the evacuation of this aeroplane could be done best.

The 19 passengers who are trapped in the aircraft may be affected significantly by this reason.

Even if the aircraft doors are opened, there are still a lot of chances that they are locked, giving passengers time to flee before the cabin is submerged. The majority of the passengers in the Precision Air ATR 42-500 were trapped inside, and neighbouring fishermen were desperately trying to save them. However, they did a great job at evacuating the passengers, and some of them eventually emerged and entered the boats.
Authorities have been working to pull the plane out of the water and move it closer to land in addition to attempting to evacuate the passengers. The tail was the only portion of the fuselage that was ever visible. The rescue efforts have caused the jet to partially climb out of the water. One thousand people used ropes to tie a rope to the tail of the aeroplane and pull it out of the water.
According to the Wikipedia source, the ATR42 reported 12 crashes, including the Precision Air ATR 42-500 water landing crash, which was a first of its kind. The manufacturer of ATR aircraft has displayed a demonstration film for the evacuation procedure. It is crucial that the passengers and the crew get ready for the crash landing and aftermath.
When an aeroplane tries to land because of terrible weather, it might not be aware that it could overrun the runway and land on water. The crew will have adequate time to prepare for a crash landing if they are fully aware of the situation. Although the Precision Air ATR 42-500 pilots successfully controlled the landing, they were unable to evacuate the wreckage. Investigations will eventually uncover the complete details of what specifically led to the aircraft’s crash landing.
what do you think about the Precision Air ATR 42-500 crash Post a comment and let us know.

He is an aviation journalist and the founder of Jetline Marvel. Dawal gained a comprehensive understanding of the commercial aviation industry.  He has worked in a range of roles for more than 9 years in the aviation and aerospace industry. He has written more than 1700 articles in the aerospace industry. When he was 19 years old, he received a national award for his general innovations and holds the patent. He completed two postgraduate degrees simultaneously, one in Aerospace and the other in Management. Additionally, he authored nearly six textbooks on aviation and aerospace tailored for students in various educational institutions. jetlinem4(at)gmail.com

Aerospace

Take First Glimpse of USAF B-21 Raider, Latest Nuclear Stealth Bomber

Take First Glimpse of USAF B-21 Raider, Latest Nuclear Stealth Bomber
Image:USAF

The United States Air Force (USAF) has unveiled the first photographs of the Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider bomber in flight.

These images were captured during test flights conducted by the B-21 Combined Test Force at Edwards Air Force Base, marking a significant milestone in the development of this sixth-generation aircraft.

Advertisement

Currently undergoing flight tests in California, the B-21 Raider represents the next generation of stealth bombers. With an estimated cost of around $700 million per aircraft, the B-21 Raider is poised to become a crucial component of the USAF’s arsenal for conventional Long Range Strike missions.

According to Air Force briefings, the B-21 Raider will form part of a comprehensive family of systems, encompassing Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance capabilities, electronic warfare, communication systems, and more. Notably, the bomber will be nuclear-capable and adaptable for both manned and unmanned operations.

Advertisement

It boasts the flexibility to deploy a wide array of stand-off and direct-attack munitions, ensuring versatility in various combat scenarios. One of the B-21’s distinguishing features is its extensive integration of digital technology, as highlighted in discussions held during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

Designed with an open systems architecture, the B-21 Raider is built to swiftly incorporate emerging technologies, ensuring its effectiveness against evolving threats over time. The B-21 Raider is slated to replace the aging B-1 Lancer and B-2 Spirit bombers, bolstering US national security objectives and providing reassurance to allies and partners worldwide.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aerospace

Aurora Flight Sciences Unveils Innovative X-Plane Design

Aurora Flight Sciences Unveils Innovative X-Plane Design

Aurora Flight Sciences, a Boeing company, has recently completed the conceptual design review for a groundbreaking high-speed, vertical lift X-plane.

This aircraft, part of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) program called Speed and Runway Independent Technologies (SPRINT), aims to demonstrate key technologies and integrated concepts that combine high speed with runway independence.

Advertisement

Aurora’s design features a low-drag, fan-in-wing demonstrator integrated into a blended wing body platform. This innovative approach merges the agility of vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) with exceptional speed capabilities.

The team is focused on ensuring the program’s success by setting the stage for successful flight demonstrations, showcasing a transformative capability for air mobility and Special Operations Forces (SOF) missions.

Advertisement

New renderings of the fan-in-wing (FIW) demonstrator show three lift fans, a more refined composite exterior, and an uncrewed cockpit. The decision to use three lift fans simplifies the demonstrator, streamlining its path to flight testing. This FIW technology can be scaled to incorporate four or more lift fans to meet future aircraft requirements, potentially leading to a new family of systems.

Additionally, while the current demonstrator is uncrewed to facilitate testing and reduce risk, the FIW technology is fully adaptable to crewed aircraft. Aurora’s concept is designed to meet or exceed DARPA’s challenging program objectives. The blended wing body platform is capable of a 450-knot cruise speed, and the embedded lift fans with integrated covers enable a smooth transition from vertical to horizontal flight.

Advertisement

The design also utilizes existing engine solutions, reducing development risks and timelines. Besides VTOL, the aircraft can perform short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL), super short take-off and landing (SSTOL), and conventional take-off and landing.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aerospace

China Developing Comac C939 Wide Body Aircraft to Compete with A350 and B777

Comac Eyes Saudi Arabian Market to Challenge Western Aircraft Giants


China’s Comac aircraft company is currently underway with the development of its own wide-body aircraft, the C939, positioned to compete with industry stalwarts like the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 in the future. This strategic move by Comac involves crafting the next iteration with enhanced capacity and extended range capabilities, marking a significant leap forward in technological advancement compared to the current C919 aircraft.

Air China has inked a substantial deal worth a staggering $10.8 billion, based on list prices, to acquire 100 Comac C919 jets, signaling a strong vote of confidence in the domestic challenger to aerospace giants Airbus and Boeing.

Advertisement

China Comac C919 Total Order

With both China Southern and Air China combining orders for nearly 200 aircraft, the prospects for the new C919 aircraft appear increasingly promising for future fleet growth. To date, Comac has garnered orders for nearly 1,100 aircraft.

China is contemplating the development of another wide-body aircraft, the C939, poised to significantly bolster the aerospace industry in China.

Advertisement

COMAC has initiated work on the C939, a new wide-body airliner. While design concepts have been formulated, it will still take several years before a prototype materializes, according to reports from the South China Morning Post, citing anonymous sources.

Initially intended to be a joint venture with Russia, plans were halted due to Russia’s decision to safeguard its copyrights and technological advancements within its borders. Consequently, collaboration between China and Russia on aircraft development was discontinued. Sources suggest that China is vigorously pursuing new avenues for the independent development of its own wide-body aircraft, crucial for accommodating larger passenger capacities and extended flight ranges.

Advertisement

Comac C939 competes with Boeing 777 and A350

Information regarding the program remains limited. COMAC has refrained from commenting on the development of the new aircraft type, stating that official announcements will be made in due course. Nevertheless, the C939 could potentially accommodate up to 390 passengers, positioning it to compete with the largest Boeing 777 and Airbus A350 aircraft.

In addition to the prospective C939, COMAC is already advancing with the development of another widebody aircraft, known as the C929. This aircraft is poised to rival the Boeing 787 and Airbus A330, boasting 280 seats and a range approaching 6,500 nautical miles.

Advertisement

Since obtaining certification in late 2022, the COMAC C919 has been operational, accumulating nearly 1,000 firm orders, predominantly from Chinese-owned airlines and leasing companies.

With multiple widebody aircraft in the pipeline, COMAC stands to achieve parity with the two leading international aircraft manufacturers. Boeing, with its 777 and 787 models, and Airbus, with the A330neo and A350, both have a comparable range of offerings. However, Boeing’s aircraft are encountering delays and production challenges despite substantial orders, while the A350 is performing commendably, though the A330neo’s order intake has not met initial projections.

Advertisement

How much does C919 cost?

China is under pressure to fulfill the current orders for the C919 aircraft, prompting plans to expand production facilities across various regions within the country. The aim is to ramp up production capacity for C919 planes to 150 aircraft annually over the next five years. The latest reports indicate that the C919 is priced around $99 million, comparable to the price of Boeing 737 Max and Airbus A320 aircraft, with expectations for further price reductions in the future.

Advertisement

While the C919 has yet to be certified in major aviation markets outside of China, only four have been delivered thus far. In the long term, COMAC’s widebody aircraft will vie for global competitiveness. One potential benefit of COMAC aircraft could be in reducing China’s reliance on Western aircraft manufacturers. However, this shift won’t happen immediately; the current delivery rate of four aircraft in nearly 18 months is not sustainable, and both Airbus and Boeing have established manufacturing facilities in China to cater to its sizable market.

Nevertheless, assuming COMAC addresses the issues impeding deliveries, there’s a plausible scenario where the manufacturer assumes a significant role, particularly as China’s aviation market continues to expand.

Advertisement

As the C939 progresses through its development stages, more details are expected to emerge. Comparisons between official specifications of the C929 and C939 will be noteworthy, as will the initial orders for each aircraft type. However, it’s anticipated that neither will undergo test flights or enter into service for several years.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Advertisement

Trending