Connect with us

Airlines

DGCA imposes $36,000 fine on IndiGo following tail strikes

IndiGo introduces 11 new codeshare routes across Australia

IndiGo was fined ₹ 3 million ($36,471)  by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) on Friday for committing four tail strikes in the course of six months this year. The regulator claimed that after conducting examinations, it discovered several flaws in the airline’s operations, training, and engineering procedures documentation.

Akasa airline suffers data breach, passengers’ personal information leaked(Opens in a new browser tab)

Advertisement

In a six-month period in the year 2023, “Indigo Airlines experienced four tail strike incidents on A321 aircraft. The DGCA performed a specialized audit of Indigo Airlines, reviewing their operational, training, engineering, and FDM programme documents and procedures. The paperwork for Indigo Airlines’ operations/training processes and engineering procedures contained several systemic flaws, according to the special audit, it said.

The government’s multiple levels of assessment judged Indigo’s response to the regulator’s show cause notice to be inadequate, according to the ministry. The company said in a statement that it is reviewing the regulator’s order and will respond as soon as possible, adding that the DGCA has given IndiGo one month to file an appeal.

Advertisement

Spirit Airlines flight makes emergency landing after ‘double lightning strikes’(Opens in a new browser tab)

In order to comply with regulatory standards, the DGCA has ordered Interglobe Aviation, which runs IndiGo, to modify its papers and operating procedures.

Advertisement

The DGCA action was in response to two recent incidences in which unauthorized individuals were allowed into the cockpit during scheduled flights. The DGCA had instructed the heads of operations of all scheduled airlines in advice to “prevent any unauthorized entry in the cockpit through appropriate means.” Unauthorized individuals are not permitted in the cockpit under DGCA safety regulations, and any entry that occurs is in violation of regulations.

Source:

Advertisement
Advertisement

Airlines

Mid-Flight Chaos: Eva Air Flight Attendants Praised for Halting Brawl Over Seat Dispute

Mid-Flight Chaos: Eva Air Flight Attendants Praised for Halting Brawl Over Seat Dispute

In a remarkable display of bravery and quick thinking, three female flight attendants from Eva Air have been lauded as heroes after diffusing a tense altercation between two male passengers aboard a flight from Taiwan to San Francisco.

The incident unfolded onboard EVA Air flight BR8 on May 7, just hours into the 11½-hour journey from Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport to San Francisco International Airport.

Advertisement

Reports suggest that the confrontation erupted over a seat dispute when one passenger sought to switch seats due to concerns over a neighbor’s coughing. In the ensuing chaos, the passenger who attempted to claim the seat was met with resistance from its original occupant, leading to a physical altercation.

Witnesses on the flight described a scene of escalating tension as one passenger attempted to strike the other, prompting the swift intervention of the cabin crew. Video footage shared on social media captured the moment when the flight attendants courageously stepped in to separate the brawling passengers, with one attendant holding back the assailant while others intervened to prevent further escalation.

Advertisement

Passenger Alex Pierce, who captured the incident on video, expressed his concern for the safety of the flight attendants amidst the chaos. Despite the volatile situation, the Eva Air crew remained composed and acted decisively to restore order on the aircraft.

Following the intervention of the flight attendants, the two unruly passengers were handed over to US law enforcement upon the flight’s arrival in California. Eva Air reiterated its zero-tolerance policy towards disruptive behavior and commended the crew for their exemplary response to the incident.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Airlines

Why do airplane tires cause smoke at touchdown?

Why do airplane tires cause smoke at touchdown?

When an aircraft touches down during landing, the appearance of smoke is a common sight. This occurrence arises from a combination of factors related to the landing procedure and the characteristics of the tires themselves.

As the aircraft descends and prepares for touchdown, the tires are stationary. Upon contact with the ground, they rapidly accelerate from a standstill to an average speed of 240 to 260 km/h. This sudden burst of motion creates friction between the tires and the runway surface, resulting in the emission of smoke.

Advertisement

The smoke stems from the considerable heat generated by the friction between the rubber tires and the asphalt runway. This heat is sufficient to cause the rubber to almost vaporize, resembling the smoke produced when a bike tire skids against the road.

Several variables influence the intensity and occurrence of smoke during landings. The frequency of landings a tire experiences within a specific timeframe, such as within 24 hours, impacts its level of wear and tear. Airlines rigorously inspect tire conditions before each flight, promptly replacing them if any damage or signs of deterioration are detected to uphold safety standards.

Advertisement

The design and resilience of aircraft tires are influenced by the type of aircraft and its operational demands. For example, the tires used on an Airbus A330-200 differ in composition and load capacity compared to those designed for conventional automobiles. Furthermore, environmental factors such as runway temperatures and altitude variations contribute to tire performance.

Aircraft tires are meticulously engineered to endure the demanding conditions of takeoff and landing. They incorporate multiple layers of nylon for reinforcement and a wire core to prevent slippage on the rim. Moreover, these tires are filled with nitrogen, offering superior properties compared to conventional compressed air for aviation purposes.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Airlines

FedEx B767 Freighter Aircraft Lands in Istanbul Without Nose Gear

A FedEx cargo Boeing 767-300F, bearing registration N110FE, faced a tense situation as it embarked on what should have been a routine journey from Paris’s Charles de Gaulle Airport to Istanbul.

However, mid-flight, the pilots discovered a malfunction in the front landing gear, setting off a chain of events that culminated in a dramatic emergency landing at Istanbul Airport on 8th May.

Advertisement

According to reports from the state-run Anadolu Agency, the crew onboard Flight FX6238 promptly alerted authorities at Istanbul Airport upon realizing the landing gear failure. With nerves of steel, they maneuvered the aircraft under the guidance of the control tower, navigating the challenge of landing without the crucial support of the front landing gear.

As the FedEx plane descended toward the runway, onlookers, and social media users witnessed a nerve-wracking sight: the aircraft relying solely on its back landing gear, gently touching its nose to the tarmac in a controlled landing.

Advertisement

In response to the emergency, airport rescue and fire fighting teams sprang into action, ready to respond to any potential disaster. Fortunately, their services were not required as the skilled piloting and swift coordination ensured the safety of all onboard. Despite the intensity of the situation, there were no reported injuries among the passengers or crew.

The incident prompted the temporary closure of runway 16R at Istanbul Airport, but the quick action of authorities ensured that flight operations continued smoothly on other runways. Istanbul Governor Davut Gul reassured the public of the airport’s robust infrastructure and emergency response capabilities, emphasizing that such incidents are managed effectively to minimize disruptions.

Advertisement

Still, questions concerning Boeing aircraft quality control have been raised once again in light of the emergency landing. This event adds to the ongoing criticism of Boeing’s safety measures in light of the recent controversies concerning the company’s manufacturing operations.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Advertisement

Trending