Connect with us

Airlines

Crying baby on 29-hour flight sparks debate as travellers demand child-free flights

On a 29-hour flight from #NewZealand to #Berlin, a passenger voiced his affliction at a baby on the aisle who cried continuously through the #long-haul #journey.

On a 29-hour flight from New Zealand to Berlin, a passenger voiced his affliction at a baby on the aisle who cried continuously through the long-haul journey.  Henry Beasley, a weary traveller, recorded his adventure in a video that he shared on TikTok.

Air New Zealand connects Auckland and New York for the first time ever(Opens in a new browser tab)

Advertisement

Balu Brigada band member from New Zealand requested that his “29-hour flight to Berlin” be “rated” by the audience. In the first video that was uploaded to the website, the passenger’s face was in focus as the camera recorded the baby’s cries in the background.

The remaining portions of the video featured a selection of various events that occurred over the course of the journey. Beasley remarked at the beginning of the clip that the infant was off to a “strong start” and expressed his response to the loud screaming.

Advertisement

The infant has some lungs, he added in-joke, before adding that they had “great projection.” At one point, Beasley referred to a prolonged scream that lasted a few seconds as “a great lengthy one here.”

Passenger wounded as Myanmar rebels shoot airliner(Opens in a new browser tab)

Advertisement

When the lights were dimmed later in the flight, Beasley made a joke: “His irritated eyes twitched, “Bring it on home now. He added the following text caption at the video’s conclusion: “excellent performance incredible stamina. 10/10.”

The TikTok video that went viral ignited a discussion about travelling with small children. The video received 220,000 likes, and one comment read: “Honestly, there should be kid flights and kid-free flights.” Another person added: “Children shouldn’t be permitted on flights longer than four hours.” Another person said, “I would pay EXTRA for planes without kids.”

Advertisement

https://cdn.jwplayer.com/previews/I9YZk0tu

This international airport got the most Indian visitors in 2022, details here(Opens in a new browser tab)

Advertisement

Parents also agreed that small children shouldn’t travel on lengthy flights; one person wrote: “I know some families don’t have the option, but I never brought my babies or toddlers on flights.  Everyone understands the pain. However, some commenters supported parents travelling with young children, stating that the experience is definitely more difficult for them.

One person said, “I feel awful for the passengers, but I also can’t imagine being ‘that parent’! The strain would be ridiculous.

Advertisement

Source:

Advertisement
Advertisement

Airlines

Federal Court Imposes $100M Fine on Qantas for “Ghost Flights” Scandal

Federal Court Imposes $100M Fine on Qantas for "Ghost Flights" Scandal

In a major ruling, the Federal Court has confirmed a hefty A$100 million penalty against Qantas for its involvement in the “ghost flights” scandal. As reported by FlightGlobal.

The court found that Qantas misled consumers by offering and selling tickets for flights that the airline had already decided to cancel. Adding to the controversy, Qantas failed to promptly notify ticket holders about these cancellations.

Advertisement

The penalty follows Qantas’ admission of violating the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). The airline agreed with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) on the penalty amount, aiming to deter Qantas and other businesses from similar breaches in the future.

Embraer Opens Applications for 2025 Software and Data Science Training Initiative

Advertisement

The ACCC emphasized that this substantial fine sends a clear message: misleading customers will lead to serious consequences, regardless of a company’s size. In addition to the penalty, Qantas has committed to paying approximately A$20 million to affected passengers who unknowingly purchased tickets for canceled flights.

This compensation comes on top of any refunds or alternative flight arrangements already provided. ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb praised the penalty, underscoring the importance of robust compliance programs red energy qantas in large corporations like Qantas.

Advertisement

She pointed out that Qantas has since made changes to its operating and scheduling procedures to prevent similar issues in the future.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending