Connect with us

Airlines

Which US Airports Have the Longest and Shortest Wait Times in 2023?

Which US Airports Have the Longest and Shortest Wait Times?

Travelers have legitimate concerns about the potential air travel portion of their travels with the busy summer season rapidly approaching. The extremely long lines at airports and the frequent and extensive flight delays we experienced in 2023. The summer season often brings an increase in passenger volumes, leading to crowded terminals, longer queues, and potential delays.

British Airways has announced a new direct route from London Heathrow to the Cincinnati region(Opens in a new browser tab)

Advertisement

In the midst of the anticipation, luggage storage company Bounce conducted a timely new study, analyzing the average time it takes to get through a number of the country’s major airports, including passing through TSA security checks and passport control points—to identify the U.S. airports that currently have the longest and shortest security passenger wait times.

U.S. airports with the longest wait times

Advertisement
  1. John F. Kennedy International Airport: Taking the top spot is New York’s JFK International Airport. The current average wait time for security is 22 minutes, 48 seconds. You will also need to spend 25 minutes, 36 seconds in passport control, for a total of 48 minutes, 24 seconds. JFK handles a lot of both domestic and international travelers as one of the busiest airports in the US. Longer lines at passport control and security checkpoints result from increased pressure on the infrastructure and staff at the airport.
  2. San Francisco International Airport, California: It had a total wait time of 47 minutes, 18 seconds. SFO is a major entry point for international travel, especially from Asia and Europe. However, the large number of international travelers strains the security and passport control procedures. Similarly to this, the layout and space constraints of the airport can lead to bottlenecks and lengthen wait times.
  3. Miami International Airport, Florida: The combined average wait time at Miami International Airport is 45 minutes and 54 seconds, placing it third overall. As an important hub for flights to and from Latin America and the Caribbean, MIA sees a sizable influx of visitors from abroad. This can result in longer lines at passport control.
  4. Fort Lauderdale–Hollywood International Airport, Florida: The airport with the longest average wait for passport control is Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International, where the wait time is 25 minutes and 54 seconds. One of the busiest airports in the world, JFK, is just a few seconds slower than that. Passport control lines can get busy because of the large passenger volume, especially during the busiest travel hours.
courtesy: Bounce

U.S. airports with the shortest wait times

  • 1. Baltimore/Washington International Airport, Maryland: Passengers fly through security and passport checks here with a cumulative wait time of just 14 minutes and 48 seconds. Fewer passengers could mean shorter lines at passport control and security.
  • 2. San Antonio International Airport, Texas: With a total wait time of 17 minutes and 42 seconds, San Antonio comes in second. SAT, which is based in Uptown Central San Antonio, Texas, sees less passenger flow because it is not a significant airline hub. The airport predominantly handles domestic flights, which can result in shorter lines at security and passport check.
  • 3. San Jose International Airport, California: It had a cumulative wait time of 18 minutes and 18 seconds, round off at the top three. Lessening wait times may be a result of the decreased passenger volume and the fact that business travelers are more familiar with the security processes.
  • 4. Newark Liberty International Airport, New Jersey: It has the shortest three minute, six-second average security wait. Despite the fact that Newark serves as a significant hub for both domestic and foreign aircraft, the wait times for security do not reflect this. This might be the result of effective planning and construction, as well as cutting-edge security tools like CT scanners and automated screening lanes.
Courtesy: Bounce
Advertisement

Airlines

Mid-Flight Chaos: Eva Air Flight Attendants Praised for Halting Brawl Over Seat Dispute

Mid-Flight Chaos: Eva Air Flight Attendants Praised for Halting Brawl Over Seat Dispute

In a remarkable display of bravery and quick thinking, three female flight attendants from Eva Air have been lauded as heroes after diffusing a tense altercation between two male passengers aboard a flight from Taiwan to San Francisco.

The incident unfolded onboard EVA Air flight BR8 on May 7, just hours into the 11½-hour journey from Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport to San Francisco International Airport.

Advertisement

Reports suggest that the confrontation erupted over a seat dispute when one passenger sought to switch seats due to concerns over a neighbor’s coughing. In the ensuing chaos, the passenger who attempted to claim the seat was met with resistance from its original occupant, leading to a physical altercation.

Witnesses on the flight described a scene of escalating tension as one passenger attempted to strike the other, prompting the swift intervention of the cabin crew. Video footage shared on social media captured the moment when the flight attendants courageously stepped in to separate the brawling passengers, with one attendant holding back the assailant while others intervened to prevent further escalation.

Advertisement

Passenger Alex Pierce, who captured the incident on video, expressed his concern for the safety of the flight attendants amidst the chaos. Despite the volatile situation, the Eva Air crew remained composed and acted decisively to restore order on the aircraft.

Following the intervention of the flight attendants, the two unruly passengers were handed over to US law enforcement upon the flight’s arrival in California. Eva Air reiterated its zero-tolerance policy towards disruptive behavior and commended the crew for their exemplary response to the incident.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Airlines

Why do airplane tires cause smoke at touchdown?

Why do airplane tires cause smoke at touchdown?

When an aircraft touches down during landing, the appearance of smoke is a common sight. This occurrence arises from a combination of factors related to the landing procedure and the characteristics of the tires themselves.

As the aircraft descends and prepares for touchdown, the tires are stationary. Upon contact with the ground, they rapidly accelerate from a standstill to an average speed of 240 to 260 km/h. This sudden burst of motion creates friction between the tires and the runway surface, resulting in the emission of smoke.

Advertisement

The smoke stems from the considerable heat generated by the friction between the rubber tires and the asphalt runway. This heat is sufficient to cause the rubber to almost vaporize, resembling the smoke produced when a bike tire skids against the road.

Several variables influence the intensity and occurrence of smoke during landings. The frequency of landings a tire experiences within a specific timeframe, such as within 24 hours, impacts its level of wear and tear. Airlines rigorously inspect tire conditions before each flight, promptly replacing them if any damage or signs of deterioration are detected to uphold safety standards.

Advertisement

The design and resilience of aircraft tires are influenced by the type of aircraft and its operational demands. For example, the tires used on an Airbus A330-200 differ in composition and load capacity compared to those designed for conventional automobiles. Furthermore, environmental factors such as runway temperatures and altitude variations contribute to tire performance.

Aircraft tires are meticulously engineered to endure the demanding conditions of takeoff and landing. They incorporate multiple layers of nylon for reinforcement and a wire core to prevent slippage on the rim. Moreover, these tires are filled with nitrogen, offering superior properties compared to conventional compressed air for aviation purposes.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Airlines

FedEx B767 Freighter Aircraft Lands in Istanbul Without Nose Gear

A FedEx cargo Boeing 767-300F, bearing registration N110FE, faced a tense situation as it embarked on what should have been a routine journey from Paris’s Charles de Gaulle Airport to Istanbul.

However, mid-flight, the pilots discovered a malfunction in the front landing gear, setting off a chain of events that culminated in a dramatic emergency landing at Istanbul Airport on 8th May.

Advertisement

According to reports from the state-run Anadolu Agency, the crew onboard Flight FX6238 promptly alerted authorities at Istanbul Airport upon realizing the landing gear failure. With nerves of steel, they maneuvered the aircraft under the guidance of the control tower, navigating the challenge of landing without the crucial support of the front landing gear.

As the FedEx plane descended toward the runway, onlookers, and social media users witnessed a nerve-wracking sight: the aircraft relying solely on its back landing gear, gently touching its nose to the tarmac in a controlled landing.

Advertisement

In response to the emergency, airport rescue and fire fighting teams sprang into action, ready to respond to any potential disaster. Fortunately, their services were not required as the skilled piloting and swift coordination ensured the safety of all onboard. Despite the intensity of the situation, there were no reported injuries among the passengers or crew.

The incident prompted the temporary closure of runway 16R at Istanbul Airport, but the quick action of authorities ensured that flight operations continued smoothly on other runways. Istanbul Governor Davut Gul reassured the public of the airport’s robust infrastructure and emergency response capabilities, emphasizing that such incidents are managed effectively to minimize disruptions.

Advertisement

Still, questions concerning Boeing aircraft quality control have been raised once again in light of the emergency landing. This event adds to the ongoing criticism of Boeing’s safety measures in light of the recent controversies concerning the company’s manufacturing operations.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Advertisement

Trending