Connect with us

Aviation

Qantas test flight from London to Sydney nonstop takes off

qantas newyork
  • 2 of 3 Project Sunrise research flights to reduce jetlag and design optimum crew rest and work pattern
  • Builds on learnings from New York-Sydney service last month
  • ‘Supper at breakfast time’ among changes to on-board service to help passengers adjust to new timezone
  • Almost 100 years to the day that the first London to Australia flight operated

Australia’s national carrier is preparing for its second ultra-long haul research flight, as part of scientific studies into minimising jetlag for passengers and improving crew wellbeing.

Aviation Industry CTO’S Issue Joint Call to Action to Deliver Sustainable Aviation Plans

The first research flight operated between New York and Sydney non-stop four weeks ago with 49 passengers and crew. It cut around three hours off the typical gate-to-gate travel time of current one-stop flights.

Advertisement

The airline has re-purposed the delivery flights of three brand new 787 Dreamliner aircraft, which would otherwise ferry empty from Seattle to Australia. A third research flight, repeating the New York-Sydney route, will take place in December.

Boeing and Ethiopian airlines responses on Flight 302 crash.

Advertisement

Tomorrow’s flight marks only the second time in history that a commercial airline has flown direct from London to Sydney. The first was 30 years ago in 1989, when Qantas operated a 747-400 ferry flight between the two cities. The aircraft that performed that flight (VH-OJA) is now on public display at an aviation museum, south of Sydney.

THE GULFSTREAM G700 SETS INTERNATIONAL CITY-PAIR SPEED RECORDS FOR THE FIRST TIME.

Advertisement

Researchers from the University of Sydney’s Charles Perkins Centre as well as the Cooperative Research Centre for Alertness, Safety and Productivity (Alertness CRC) will again travel on the non-stop Dreamliner flight to collect passenger and crew data.

United Airlines fined $1.9 million for long ground delays

Advertisement

The findings from all three research flights will be used to inform future service and product design, aimed at increasing wellbeing and comfort during travel on long-haul flights – in particular the direct flights Qantas hopes to operate on a commercial basis between the east coast of Australia and London and New York.

Project Sunrise Research Flight #2 – London to Sydney 

Advertisement

The research flight will carry around 50 passengers and crew in order to give the 787-9 the range required for the 17,800 km flight, expected to take around 19 and a half hours.

While the flight is over 1,500 kilometers further than New York to Sydney, the duration is expected to be similar due to prevailing tail winds between London and Sydney.

Advertisement

Qantas preparing flights, New Zealand opens skies for Australia

All carbon emissions from the research flights will be offset. Qantas recently announced an acceleration of its efforts to reduce its broader carbon footprint, including effectively doubling current levels of flight offsetting, capping carbon emissions from 2020 onwards and totally eliminate net emissions by the year 2050. (link to environment press release)

Advertisement

Flight fast facts

  • QF 7879 flight from London to Sydney will take around 19-and-a-half hours subject to wind and weather conditions on the day. Distance between London and Sydney is 17,800 kilometres (11,000 miles). This compares to a travel time of 22 hours and 35 minutes on the current London to Sydney via Singapore flight.
  • The flight will be operated by a brand-new Boeing 787-9 with a special Qantas Centenary livery, registration VH ZNJ, named “Longreach”.
  • Four pilots will be on rotation throughout the flight. Two additional pilots will be in the cabin, having flown the aircraft to London.
  • The route will depart London and overfly 11 countries including England, Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Belarus, Russia, Kazakhstan, China, Philippines and Indonesia before crossing the Australian coast near Darwin, tracking across the country before descending into Sydney.
  • The aircraft will operate with a maximum fuel load of approx. 126,000 litres. Projected fuel remaining upon landing is approximately 7,500 litres which translates to about 100 minutes of flight time.
  • Maximum take-off weight for a 787-9 is 254,000kg. QF 7879 LHR to SYD will depart at 233,000kg take-off weight with the same amount of fuel that Qantas departs Perth to London flights with.
  • Flight will travel at 85% the speed of sound which is around 930 kilometres an hour. Cruising altitude will start at 35,000 feet and then as the aircraft weight reduces with fuel burn, the cruising altitude will increase to 40,000 feet.

Southwest Airlines jet engine ‘explosion’ leaves woman dead

 

Advertisement

He is an aviation journalist and the founder of Jetline Marvel. Dawal gained a comprehensive understanding of the commercial aviation industry.  He has worked in a range of roles for more than 9 years in the aviation and aerospace industry. He has written more than 1700 articles in the aerospace industry. When he was 19 years old, he received a national award for his general innovations and holds the patent. He completed two postgraduate degrees simultaneously, one in Aerospace and the other in Management. Additionally, he authored nearly six textbooks on aviation and aerospace tailored for students in various educational institutions. jetlinem4(at)gmail.com

Aviation

Israel vs Iran Military Power Comparison: Which country is stronger?

Explore the comparative analysis of Israel and Iran’s military capabilities. Delve into the strengths and strategic considerations of each nation to assess potential outcomes in the event of conflict.

Israel vs Iran Military Power Comparison: Which country is stronger?

In this article, we’ll delve into the power dynamics between Iran and Israel. With Israel launching multiple attacks on various Middle Eastern regions, both countries have initiated defensive measures against each other.

We’ll explore the respective features of both nations, although it’s important to note that the accuracy of the report may not align precisely with information from public domain sources.

Advertisement

Global Military Index ranking

According to the Military Power Index, Iran holds the 14th position while Israel holds the 17th. This index provides a direct comparison of the armed forces of the two nations. It suggests that Iran surpasses Israel in terms of manpower, as well as in the number of tanks and armed vehicles.

In the ongoing conflict, the world is divided into two sides: Israel and Iran. Countries in the Asian region, such as Russia, the Middle East, and China, strongly support Iran, as they are its main military suppliers. On the other hand, Israel receives its main backing from the United States and European countries.

Advertisement

Iran and Isreal Distance

Both countries, separated by neighboring nations like Iraq and Jordan, face a considerable distance between them. For attacks across such distances, they heavily rely on potent weaponry, especially through air-to-ground assaults.

Both possess formidable defense aircraft and military tanks, which undoubtedly influence the war’s outcome.

Advertisement

Given that the distance between Jerusalem and Tehran is approximately 1,850 kilometers (1,149 miles), conducting attacks over such long distances requires aircraft with extensive flying ranges.

Israel may lack the inherent power to reach Iran directly, necessitating mid-air refueling or the use of long-range missiles to execute such operations.

Advertisement

Which military is stronger Israel or Iran?


In terms of Israel, it boasts advanced technology in the defense sector, with a strong focus on both business and innovation. It serves as a key supplier of guided rockets and various critical weapons to the defense market. Many domestically-built military tankers and advanced weaponry have proven their efficacy on the battlefield.

Advertisement

Israel stands out as a significant defense equipment supplier, particularly due to strong support from NATO countries like the US, Europe, and the UK. This backing provides access to the most advanced fighter jets and technologies, including 5th-generation fighters.

Israel vs Iran Military Power Comparison: Which country is stronger?
Army Military Apache Helicopter Attack Chopper

Conversely, Iran faces challenges in acquiring the latest weaponry, relying heavily on Russian and Chinese technology, along with seized equipment from Iraq and Afghanistan, predominantly sourced from the United States.

Iran’s domestic development of aircraft has been limited, and maintenance is hindered by parts shortages. Additionally, disruptions in supply chains, particularly due to the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, pose significant hurdles for Iran in acquiring military equipment.

Advertisement

However, Iran has made upgrades, particularly in ground-to-air attack munitions procured from Russia. These include long-range ballistic missiles capable of inflicting heavy damage on enemy territory.

Advertisement

How many fighter jets are in Israel & Iran?


When comparing air attack capabilities, Israel’s air force surpasses Iran’s in terms of aircraft quantity. According to the Global Firepower Index, Israel holds a clear advantage in air power. The Israeli army boasts a total of 612 fighter jets, whereas Iran possesses 551.

Advertisement

Israel operates a fleet of 75 Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II aircraft. Additionally, they possess 58 Boeing F-15 Eagle jets. Moreover, Israel has 25 Boeing F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft in its arsenal.

Israel vs Iran Military Power Comparison: Which country is stronger?

Furthermore, the Israeli Air Force boasts 343 General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon jets. Lastly, they maintain a fleet of 30 Boeing AH-64 Apache helicopters.

Israel possesses numerous advanced fighter jets and military aircraft equipped with some of the most lethal weapons available.

Advertisement


Iran’s fighter aircraft inventory includes the Mikoyan MiG-29 acquired in 1991, 40 Grumman F-14 Tomcats, 20 Su-22s, 24 Chengdu J-7s, 23 Mirage F1s, and 60 McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom IIs, showcasing its commitment to diverse defense capabilities.


Iran’s inventory primarily consists of outdated aircraft, many of which are around 20 years old. However, according to the Iran Defense Ministry, all aircraft are reportedly in good condition and deemed capable of meeting the challenges of any conflict

Advertisement

Advertisement

Iran’s and Israel’s Military Capabilities and personnel

According to the latest report, Israel’s active personnel count stands at 169,500, with an additional 465,000 individuals in reserve. Israel implements a significant policy whereby most young citizens are mandated to join the defense forces for several years to acquire skill sets essential for serving as reserved forces, ready to mobilize whenever required for defensive or offensive operations.

In comparison to Israel, Iran boasts a larger ground forces personnel count. Iran’s military comprises approximately 610,000 active-duty personnel, supplemented by 350,000 reserve and trained individuals available for mobilization as necessary.

Advertisement

This substantial manpower brings Iran’s total military strength to roughly 960,000 personnel, excluding figures for the Law Enforcement Command or Basij.

Advertisement

Does Israel have an air defense system?


Israel has developed some of the most advanced air defense systems globally, a response to the consistent threat of attacks from neighboring nations. The Iron Dome, renowned for its effectiveness, stands out as a prime example.

This smart air defense system has successfully intercepted numerous unexpected attacks on Israeli soil, with its capability to destroy incoming missiles mid-flight. Operating on constant alert, the Iron Dome swiftly neutralizes threats whenever they arise within the country’s borders.

Advertisement

Furthermore, Israel has invested heavily in enhancing its defense radar systems, enabling early detection of enemy activities from considerable distances. Pioneering in drone technology, Israel boasts the Heron pilotless planes, capable of enduring flights lasting over 30 hours, facilitating operations even in remote locations.

Additionally, Israel’s Delilah loitering munition, with an approximate range of 250 km (155 miles), though limited for operations beyond the Gulf, can be strategically deployed closer to Iran’s border by the Israeli Air Force, bridging the distance gap effectively.

Advertisement


Iran has collaborated with Russia and China to develop several air defense systems, bolstering its capabilities. Among these systems are multiple medium-range defense systems, such as the Arman, Tactical Sayyad, and Khordad-15. These systems are designed to safeguard Iranian airspace from threats at distances of up to 200 km (124 miles) and varying altitudes.

One notable system, the Arman, was unveiled in November 2022. It is strategically mounted on military trucks, enabling swift deployment within minutes to address potential threats effectively.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aircraft comparison

Osprey is faster than Chinook helicopter ?

Osprey is faster than Chinook helicopter ?


In this article, we’ll delve into two distinct military aircraft that have played essential roles in United Air Force defense. Both aircraft have unique characteristics in terms of usage and flying capabilities. One is capable of vertical takeoff and flies like an aircraft, while the other is a helicopter with two tandem rotors. Let’s explore each of these aircraft in detail.

The speed of helicopters can vary depending on several factors such as their design, engine power, payload, and mission requirements. Generally speaking, the Osprey (specifically referring to the V-22 Osprey) is faster than the Chinook helicopter.

Advertisement

The V-22 Osprey is a tiltrotor aircraft, meaning it can take off and land vertically like a helicopter but also tilt its rotors forward to fly like an airplane. This design allows the Osprey to achieve higher speeds compared to conventional helicopters. The cruising speed of the V-22 Osprey is around 241 knots (277 mph or 446 km/h).

On the other hand, the Chinook helicopter, such as the Boeing CH-47 Chinook, has a cruising speed typically around 170 knots (196 mph or 315 km/h). While the Chinook is a highly capable and versatile helicopter known for its heavy-lift capabilities and reliability, it generally operates at lower speeds compared to the Osprey.

Advertisement

The comparison between an Osprey and a Chinook helicopter involves contrasting two distinct aircraft with different designs, capabilities, and purposes:

MV-22 Osprey details:


The Osprey has garnered significant controversy since its inaugural flight, primarily stemming from issues associated with its tiltrotor design. These challenges have led to several incidents and crashes, resulting in the tragic loss of pilots and crew members and prompting multiple groundings of the aircraft.

Advertisement

However, efforts are underway to address these technical issues swiftly, with plans to rectify the problems and resume flights promptly. Despite these setbacks, the Osprey remains crucial in operational contexts, offering enhanced capabilities for transporting both cargo and crew members, underscoring its pivotal role in various missions.

Except for the United States and Japan, no other country has been granted authorization to utilize the Osprey aircraft. Its unique design and specialized nature, being built in the United States, likely necessitate governmental permission for export to other nations.

Advertisement

The Osprey stands out for its groundbreaking design and innovation, featuring the ability to transition from vertical to horizontal rotor positions while also generating thrust like a conventional aircraft.

  1. MV-22 Osprey:
    • The MV-22 Osprey is a tiltrotor aircraft, meaning it can take off and land like a helicopter but fly like a fixed-wing aircraft once airborne.
    • It’s primarily used for vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL), troop transport, cargo transport, and aerial refueling.
    • The Osprey has a unique ability to combine the vertical lift capability of a helicopter with the speed and range of a turboprop aircraft.
    • It can carry up to 24 troops or 20,000 pounds of internal cargo and has a top speed of around 315 miles per hour (507 km/h).
    • The Osprey is utilized by the U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Air Force Special Operations Command, and other military forces around the world.

Boeing CH-47 Chinook:

The Chinook helicopter stands as a testament to unparalleled engineering and innovation, making it one of the most distinctive aircraft ever constructed. Since its inception, no other nation has attempted to replicate its singular design, owing to the extraordinary precision and aerospace technology required for its construction. This helicopter, revered as an engineering marvel, has become a staple in major battlegrounds, renowned for its exceptional capacity to transport troops and cargo to any destination. Remarkably versatile, it operates seamlessly on both land and water surfaces, boasting an integrated floating system that enhances its capabilities even further.

Advertisement

Selected countries have been granted permission to utilize the Chinook helicopter, showcasing its global appeal and strategic importance. Furthermore, ongoing development efforts are underway to enhance the speed and carrying capacity of the next version of this iconic aircraft. Renowned for its exceptional safety record, the Chinook stands as one of the safest helicopters in operation today, with a remarkably low incidence of crashes. Its versatility is unmatched, making it an invaluable asset for operations in diverse terrains and environments.

  1. Boeing CH-47 Chinook:
    • The Chinook is a tandem rotor helicopter, known for its distinctive twin-rotor design.
    • It’s a heavy-lift helicopter primarily used for troop transportation, artillery emplacement, battlefield resupply, and various other missions.
    • The Chinook has a rear loading ramp for cargo and troops, making it well-suited for quick loading and unloading.
    • It can carry up to 55 troops or 24,000 pounds of cargo internally and has a top speed of around 170 miles per hour (274 km/h).
    • The Chinook is widely used by the U.S. Army and various other military forces worldwide, including the UK, Canada, and others.

Advertisement

Comparison:

  • Design: The Osprey is a tiltrotor aircraft, while the Chinook is a tandem-rotor helicopter.
  • Speed and Range: The Osprey has a higher top speed and longer range compared to the Chinook due to its fixed-wing aircraft capabilities.
  • Payload Capacity: The Chinook generally has a higher payload capacity for both troops and cargo compared to the Osprey.
  • Versatility: While both aircraft are versatile in their own right, Osprey’s ability to take off and land vertically as well as fly at high speeds over long distances gives it a unique advantage in certain scenarios. However, the Chinook’s ability to carry larger payloads makes it better suited for heavy lift operations.
  • Cost and Maintenance: Maintenance and operating costs may vary between the two aircraft, with tiltrotor technology typically being more complex than traditional helicopter designs.
Continue Reading

Most Popular .

These are the Top 10 best US airlines of 2024

These are the Top 10 best US airlines of 2024

In an era where air travel plays an integral role in connecting people and places, the quality of airline service can significantly impact travelers’ experiences.

As we navigate the ever-changing landscape of aviation, insights into the performance and reliability of different carriers become invaluable. Enter WalletHub’s comprehensive analysis, offering a glimpse into the 10 best US airlines of 2024. Join us as we embark on a journey through the clouds, exploring the top performers.

Advertisement

Best airlines of 2024

  1. Alaska Airlines (68.07 out of 100): Anchoring the list is Alaska Airlines, celebrated for its consistency and customer satisfaction. With a score of 68.07, Alaska Airlines sets the standard for excellence in the skies.
  2. SkyWest Airlines (65.96): Following closely behind is SkyWest Airlines, recognized for its operational prowess and reliability. With a score of 65.96, SkyWest secures its position among the elite.
  3. Spirit Airlines (65.69): Surging into third place is Spirit Airlines, renowned for its affordability and expansive route network. Despite its low-cost model, Spirit Airlines earns acclaim with a score of 65.69.
  4. Delta Air Lines (61.56): A stalwart of the industry, Delta Air Lines maintains its reputation for superior service and efficiency. With a score of 61.56, Delta continues to soar above the competition.
  5. United Airlines (51.96): United Airlines occupies the middle ground, offering a balance of convenience and comfort to travelers. With a score of 51.96, United remains a dependable choice for domestic and international flights.
  6. JetBlue Airways (51.6): JetBlue Airways, known for its focus on customer experience and amenities, secures its place in the top 10 with a score of 51.6.
  7. Hawaiian Airlines (48.3): Transporting passengers, Hawaiian Airlines earns accolades for its hospitality and island-inspired service. With a score of 48.3, Hawaiian Airlines embodies the spirit of aloha.
  8. American Airlines (46.52): Despite facing challenges, American Airlines maintains its presence among the top performers with a score of 46.52, showcasing resilience in the competitive aviation landscape.
  9. Frontier Airlines (43.57): Frontier Airlines offers budget-conscious travelers a gateway to the skies with its affordable fares and diverse destinations. With a score of 43.57, Frontier Airlines secures its place in the top 10.
  10. Southwest Airlines (36.03): Rounding out the list is Southwest Airlines, renowned for its no-frills approach and extensive route network. With a score of 36.03, Southwest Airlines remains a popular choice for travelers seeking simplicity and value.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Advertisement

Trending