Connect with us

Aviation

Landing Jet Nearly Causes Five-Plane Pileup And Deadliest Aircraft Disaster In History

Landing jet

On Friday night, something bizarre and very nearly catastrophic happened: an Air Canada flight, descending into San Francisco International Airport, tried to land on the taxiway instead of on the runway, where four other fully loaded planes sat.
FAA investigators are still trying to figure out what happened and how close the Air Canada flight came to crashing into the other planes on Taxiway C. Ross Aimer, CEO of Aero Consulting Experts and retired United Airlines Captain, told The Mercury News,

Even assuming that every jet involved was an Airbus A320, like the Air Canada jet (and not a widebody aircraft like a Boeing 7777), each plane would’ve probably held around 150 people. Meaning that up to 750 people could have died, easily outclassing the Tenerife Airport disaster—another case of runway confusion—which killed 583 people.
The plane had been cleared to land on Runway 28R, which is parallel to Taxiway C. The Air Canada pilot was flying the plane manually and the night was clear. He just “lined up wrong,” according to the FAA.
Here’s the audio from the air traffic control tower (reviewed by The Mercury News):

The confused Air Canada pilot asks if he’s good to land on 28R because he can see airplane lights on the runway.


“There’s no one on 28R but you,” said the air controller.

Another pilot asked, “Where’s this guy going. He’s on the taxiway.”

The air controller told the Air Canada pilot to go around. “It looks like you were lined up for Charlie [Taxiway C] there.”

A United Airlines pilot said, “United One, Air Canada flew directly over us.”
“Yeah, I saw that guys,” responded the air controller.
Thankfully, after the go-around, the Air Canada flight was able to land where it was supposed to successfully, despite TRYING TO LAND ON THE TAXIWAY MOMENTS BEFORE. An Air Canada spokesman had no other comment after The Mercury News’ request. It’s unclear why the pilot did what he did.

Aviation

Lost Tool Found in Qantas A380 After 34 Flights

Lost Tool Found in Qantas A380 After 34 Flights

An Australian Transportation Safety Bureau (ATSB) investigation recently revealed that a Qantas A380 operated 34 flights with a 1.25-meter nylon tool lodged in one of its engines.

This turning tool, used during borescope inspections to rotate the intermediate-pressure compressor, was left behind during scheduled maintenance at Los Angeles on December 6, 2023. It remained inside the engine until it was discovered by maintenance staff during a subsequent check at Los Angeles on January 1, 2024.

China Takes the Lead in Sixth-Generation Fighters with White Emperor B

The ATSB report highlights two critical lapses. First, maintenance engineers failed to notice the tool during final checks for foreign objects after the borescope inspection. Second, the lost tool procedure was not activated when the tool was identified as missing.

The certifying engineer ultimately cleared the aircraft for service without accounting for the misplaced tool. During the time qantas films the tool was inside, the A380 completed 34 flight cycles, accumulating nearly 294 hours without any noticeable effect on engine performance.

Although the tool was deformed by high-energy airflow within the engine, there was no reported damage to the engine itself. ATSB Chief Commissioner Angus Mitchell commented.

India’s C-295 to Gain Advanced Weapons for Maritime Surveillance

“This incident underscores the importance of following established maintenance protocols. Engineers missed the tool during foreign object checks, and the required lost tool procedure wasn’t started after realizing the tool was missing.”

Following the investigation, the airline issued a safety directive, urging all engineering and tool storage teams to adhere strictly to these protocols to prevent similar incidents in the future.

A qantas spokesperson stated, “While the tool didn’t impact engine performance, we take this incident very seriously. It is critical to follow the correct lost tool procedures.”

Continue Reading

Trending