Connect with us

Aircraft comparison

Comparison between TAI T929 ATAK 2 and Apache AH-64

Comparison between TAI T929 ATAK 2 and Apache AH-64

The TAI T929 ATAK 2 and the Apache are both advanced attack helicopters designed for military operations. These helicopters excel in providing close air support, conducting reconnaissance missions, and engaging enemy objectives precisely.

While the TAI T929 ATAK 2 is a newer entrant into the attack helicopter market, the Apache has established itself as one of the most commonly utilized and battle-tested attack helicopters globally.

Advertisement

In this comparison, we will look at many characteristics of these helicopters, including their performance, weaponry, avionics, and overall capabilities, in order to recognize their similarities and contrasts in performing their intended responsibilities on the battlefield.

TAI T929 ATAK 2

Advertisement

Turkish Aerospace Industries is developing a twin-engine, heavy assault helicopter called the TAI T929 ATAK 2. The helicopter is designed for attack, electronic warfare, and reconnaissance missions in all-weather environments in both day and night conditions. Some of the parts and subsystems created for the T129 and T625 Gökbey helicopter programmes will be used in the Atak 2.

The AH-64 Apache is an aircraft manufactured by Boeing Defence, Space & Security. It is a twin-engine, four-blade rotor helicopter mainly developed for close air support and anti-armour tasks. It has a tandem cockpit design, with the pilot in the back seat and the co-pilot/gunner in the front seat operating the armament systems.

Advertisement

The ATAK II, which made its maiden flight on April 28, 2023, is currently in development. It is projected that the Turkish Army will receive it starting in 2025.

The T929 helicopter is equipped with tandem seats, an asymmetrical weapons bay, a large capacity for ammunition, a low IR signature, a digital cockpit, ballistic protection, better avionics, and the potential to engage in electronic warfare and countermeasure operations.

Advertisement

To improve situational awareness and target acquisition, Apache has sophisticated sensor and avionics systems.

It has a target acquisition and designation sight called the “TADS/PNVS” (Target Acquisition Designation Sight/Pilot Night Vision System), which has the ability to see in the dark and track targets while also providing thermal imaging.

Advertisement

A forward-looking infrared turret installed on the helicopter’s nose will have target-tracking capabilities. The helicopter will also be equipped with electronic defences including heat-seeking missile jamming systems located on the tail and infrared/ultraviolet missile warning sensors.

The heavy-class helicopter can be used for close air support (CAS) operations, armed reconnaissance and surveillance, air-to-air combat, and air-to-ground warfare.

Advertisement

The TAI T929 ATAK 2 and the Apache are both attack helicopters designed for military purposes. Here’s a comparison between the two helicopters.

Armament: The T929 ATAK 2 is equipped with a 20mm chin-mounted cannon, air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground missiles, rockets, and guided munitions. While Apache AH-64E features a 30mm chain gun, air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground missiles, rockets, and other guided munitions.

Advertisement

Engine: T929 ATAK 2 is Powered by two TV3-117 turboshaft engines, each generating 1,864.25 kW (2,500.00 hp) of power. Whereas Apache is Powered by Two General Electric T700-GE-701C turboshaft engines, Each engine produces a maximum takeoff power of 1,890 shaft horsepower (1,410 kW).

MTOW: ATAK 2 has a maximum takeoff weight of 10,000 kg (22,046 lb) and can reach a maximum speed of 318 km/h (198 mph, 172 kn). Whereas Apache has a maximum takeoff weight of 10,433 kg (23,000 lb) and can reach a maximum speed of 293 km/h(182 mph, 158 kn)

Advertisement

cruise speed: ATAK 2 has a cruise speed of 314 km/h (195 mph, 170 kn). And for Apache, it has a cruise speed of 265 km/h(165 mph, 143 kn).

Service Ceiling: ATAK 2 has a service ceiling of 6,096 m (20,000 ft). While Apache has a Service Ceiling of 6,100 m(20,000 ft ).

Advertisement

The T129, which has a maximum cruising speed of 269 km/h, was also created by Turkey in collaboration with Italy AgustaWestland. The helicopter’s standard range is 561 kilometres, while its ferry range is 1,000 kilometres. It can rise at a speed of 14 metres per second.

Advertisement

Although smaller and less capable than the Apache helicopter, combat aircraft cannot compete with it in terms of operations. The T129 has a wheeled landing gear, a two-bladed tail rotor, a five-bladed main rotor, and an aluminium alloy frame.

Apache has a background. The AH-64 Apache helicopter, which was built in 1975 and has undergone a number of minor updates to improve its performance capabilities, is regarded as one of the best attack helicopters in history. This helicopter’s armour is capable of withstanding direct 23 mm bullet impacts. This helicopter’s rotor blades are also built to function well even after damage.

Advertisement

Many aerospace items, including fighter planes and training aircraft, were exclusively created in Turkey. The Turkish Air Force’s newest addition to its product lineup will be the T929 helicopter. After the testing of the T929, we will be able to determine whether it will surpass the fighting capability of the Apache. We cannot yet say which helicopter is the finest. But what is truly impressive are the efforts made by the Turkish aerospace industry.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Aircraft comparison

Comparison of Russian Irkut MC-21vs Airbus A320neo

Russia is on the brink of advancing its aircraft industry in response to Western countries’ sanctions on aerospace components. They are developing a potential competitor to Western aircraft such as the Boeing 737 Max and the Airbus A320.

The Irkut MC-21 and the Airbus A320 are both narrow-body, single-aisle commercial aircraft designed for short to medium-haul flights. While the Airbus A320 has been a longstanding and widely used aircraft in the aviation industry, the Irkut MC-21 is a newer entrant that aims to compete in the same market segment.

Advertisement

In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison between two notable aircraft: the MC 21 and the A320. Join us as we delve into each section to gain a better understanding of these aircraft and their capabilities.

mc 21

Advertisement

The MC-21, also called the Irkut MC-21, is a cutting-edge, contemporary narrow-body twinjet airliner built in Russia that was created and manufactured by Irkut Corporation. The MC-21, which made its first flight in 2017, is a technological be amazed at its advanced aerodynamics, fuel efficiency, and roomy, passenger-friendly cabin.

The well-known narrow-body, twin-engine Airbus A320 is now a mainstay of the world’s aviation fleet. Since its introduction in 1988, the A320 family has come to represent efficiency, dependability, and state-of-the-art technology. Airlines can choose the A320 series as a flexible option for short- to medium-haul routes with its unique wide cabin and sophisticated fly-by-wire control system.

Advertisement

In terms of cockpit crew, both aircraft accommodate a standard two-person crew. However, when it comes to passenger capacity, the MC-21-300 offers a configuration with 163 seats in a two-class setup (16J + 147Y), while the A320 has a slightly smaller capacity with a range of 140 to 240 passengers.

Moving on to dimensions, the MC-21-300 has a length of 42.2 meters (138 ft), whereas the A320 is slightly shorter at 37.57 meters (123 ft 3 in).

Advertisement

The MC-21-300 also has a wider wingspan, standing at an unspecified width, compared to the A320’s 35.8-meter (117 ft 5 in) wingspan.

The MC-21-300 has a maximum take-off weight of 79,250 kg (174,720 lb), slightly exceeding the A320’s maximum take-off weight of 78,000 kg (172,000 lb).

Advertisement

With a maximum payload of 22,600 kilograms (49,800 pounds), the MC-21-300 surpasses the A320, which has a maximum payload of 19.9 tons (44,000 pounds). This can impact the aircraft’s flexibility in carrying passengers, cargo, or a combination of both.

The MC-21-300 boasts a 2-class range of 6,000 kilometers (3,200 nautical miles), while the A320 has a range of 3,300 nautical miles (6,100 kilometers) under certain parameters. The MC-21-300 is equipped with Aviadvigatel PD-14 turbofan engines, while the A320 features the Pratt & Whitney PW1431G engines with a thrust of 31,000 lbf (140 kN).

Advertisement

Engine Upgrade


The Airbus A320 stands out as a popular aircraft in the narrowbody segment, offering a range that spans from shorter distances to longer routes. Airbus has extended its capabilities with the introduction of the much-anticipated A321XLR, designed for extended flights. The aircraft showcases breakthrough technologies that contribute to its overall advancement.

Advertisement

Notably, Airbus has experienced a higher number of orders for its narrowbody aircraft compared to its competitors. The A320neo, or “New Engine Option,” represents a significant leap forward. It boasts new engine choices, allowing airlines to opt for either the Pratt & Whitney PW1000G geared turbofan engine or the CFM International LEAP-1A engine.

In response to past challenges with one of its engines, Airbus is gradually transitioning to CFM engines. The previous engine-related issues resulted in setbacks for airlines and manufacturers alike. This shift underscores Airbus’s commitment to addressing concerns and ensuring the reliability of its aircraft.

Advertisement

The A320neo, an enhanced iteration of the A320, is a testament to Airbus’s dedication to incorporating cutting-edge technologies and more fuel-efficient engines. This evolution aims to improve overall performance while aligning with environmental sustainability goals.

As per reports from Russian sources, the Irkut MC-21 has achieved a milestone by successfully concluding over 160 test flights powered by the PD-14 engine. Furthermore, the aircraft’s wing has undergone a comprehensive test cycle, demonstrating positive endurance results. The PD-14 engine, developed by the United Engine Corporation (UEC), has played a pivotal role in the aircraft’s success, complementing the domestically produced composite wing.

Advertisement

Orders

Recently, Sergey Skuratov, the director-general of Ural Airlines, unveiled the carrier’s ambitious plan to acquire 40 Irkut MC-21s for its fleet. This announcement signals a noteworthy shift in Russia’s aviation landscape, as many airlines in the country are considering the adoption of domestically manufactured aircraft to replace their existing narrow-body planes sourced from Western countries. This move represents a significant milestone for Russia as it endeavors to establish a more prominent presence in the global commercial aviation sector.

Advertisement

While Airbus, with its extensive worldwide customer base and a substantial number of airplane orders, may not feel an immediate impact, the potential loss of the Russian market could pose challenges. The MC-21’s success in the Chinese market, in particular, could present hurdles for Airbus, given its significant market share. Despite facing sanctions on Western components, Russia continues to operate its A320 fleet, showcasing its resilience in meeting current and future demands for aviation passengers.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aerospace

Boeing 777-8F vs Airbus A350F: Comparing two Premium aircraft

Boeing 777-8F vs Airbus A350F: Comparing two legend aircraft

In the world of aviation, competition is a constant force. With the aftermath of the COVID pandemic, many airlines have been making a strong comeback, showing robust profit margins. Furthermore, the demand for freight services has been on the rise, necessitating the need for high-end aircraft in this sector.

In this narrative journey, we’re about to embark on, we’ll delve into the realm of two exciting newcomers in the freighter aircraft segment: A350 vs 777, The Airbus A350 Freighter, and the Boeing B777-8 Freighter.

Advertisement

These aircraft are born from the same lineage as their passenger counterparts but have been reimagined for the world of cargo transportation. Our exploration will take us through the fascinating similarities and differences between these two aircraft, examining their capacity, operational viability, and what they bring to the airlines that operate them.

Airbus A350F

The A350F can be seamlessly integrated into airline fleets, delivering step-change efficiency in terms of volume, range, and payload.

Advertisement

Airbus is proud to bring the A350F as the only choice for the future of the large widebody freighter market

The A350F, as proclaimed by Airbus, possessed an almost otherworldly ability: it showcased an unbeatable fuel efficiency that set a new benchmark for its competitors. With awe-inspiring prowess, it achieved a staggering 40% reduction in fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions when compared to the venerable 747F.

Advertisement

But the brilliance of the A350F didn’t end there. It was a revelation in seamless integration for airline fleets. As if answering the prayers of airlines worldwide, this aircraft seamlessly joined its ranks, ready to revolutionize air travel. Its introduction marked a step-change in aviation efficiency, touching every aspect of the industry.

Advertisement

Boeing’s 777x Aircraft and the Evolution of Air Freight

Boeing is keeping pace with advancements in aviation, showcasing its much-anticipated Boeing 777x aircraft, currently in the testing phase. Responding to Qatar Airways’ call, Boeing is exploring the development of a 777X-based freighter to replace the existing 777Fs.

This cutting-edge aircraft boasts next-generation avionics and technology, featuring a powerful engine that significantly elevates its performance. The extended wing structure not only enhances aerodynamics, reducing drag during cruising for improved fuel efficiency but also contributes to lower fuel consumption.

Advertisement

Introducing the 777-8 Freighter, Boeing extends its freighter family as the world’s most capable and fuel-efficient freighter, aligning with sustainability goals. The Boeing freighter family ensures optimal payload capacity and range capabilities, all while maintaining superior economics. This includes the high-volume 747-8 Freighter and the long-range 777 Freighter, solidifying Boeing’s commitment to delivering innovative solutions for the future of air freight.

Advertisement
Boeing 777-8F vs Airbus A350F – Specifications
A350F777-8F
Length70.8m70.8m
Height17.1m19.5m
Wingspan68.75m71.8m
Maximum take-off weight (MTOW)319,000kgTBC
Cargo capacity main deck30 pallets main deck,
12 in lower hold
30 pallets main deck,
12 in the lower hold
Total cargo volumeTBC766.1m3
Net revenue payload109,000kg112,264kg
Range4,700nm4,410nm
Engines2x Rolls-Royce Trent XWB2x General Electric GE9X

Boeing 777-8F and A350F Capacity

The A350F is derived from the A350-1000 and the 777-8F will have the key features of Boeing’s 777X design, including its carbon-fiber wing – the longest single composite part ever developed for an aircraft. The 777x vs A350 is unique in technology.

Advertisement

The 777-8F will be slightly larger than the A350F, with a marginally longer fuselage, taller height, and a wider wingspan. At 70.8m, the A350F will be slightly shorter than the 73.7 m-long passenger A350-1000.

On cargo payload and range, Airbus says the A350F will carry 109,000kg over 4,700nm. Boeing’s data notes the 777-8F will carry 112,300kg over 4,410nm.

Advertisement

And while the A350F’s main-deck cargo hold will have capacity for 30 pallets (measuring 244 x 318cm), with another 12 of the same size in the lower hold, the 777X will carry 31 pallets (again 244 x 318cm) on the main deck, and 13 in its lower hold. Essentially, the 777-8F will carry slightly more cargo, but the A350F will be able to fly further.

Advertisement

Boeing 777-8F and A350F efficency


Airbus stands to gain significant advantages by promptly introducing the A350F into service, recognizing the absence of a compelling cargo aircraft in its portfolio. Leveraging the already-established certification of the A350 family further reinforces its position.

In contrast, Airbus A350 vs Boeing 777. Boeing adopts a more measured approach, as the continued reception of orders for the 777F allows for sustained production over the next five years. This strategy provides a smoother transition toward the eventual production of the 777-8F.

Advertisement

The European aircraft manufacturer highlights that the A350 F will feature a 17% increase in revenue cargo volume and a payload capacity of 3,000kg greater than the current generation Boeing’s 777-9F.

In contrast, Boeing asserts that Boeing’s 777-9F will outperform the current Boeing 777F by carrying 17% more revenue payload. Boeing aims to provide the “highest payload and long-range capability” to explore new markets while ensuring a balance of “low operating cost with high reliability.”

Advertisement

Airbus emphasizes the A350 F unparalleled space for customers, claiming an 11% volume increase that accommodates an additional 5 pallets. The A350 F boasts a lighter Maximum Takeoff Weight of 30 tonnes and an impressive 99.5% operational reliability.

Further setting it apart, the Airbus A350 F features a cargo side door that surpasses competitors in size. Additionally, it promises a 20% reduction in fuel burn, contributing to enhanced efficiency and sustainability.

Advertisement

Airbus stands to gain significant advantages by promptly introducing the A350 F into service, recognizing the absence of a compelling cargo aircraft in its portfolio. Leveraging the already-established certification of the A350 family further reinforces its position.

In contrast, Boeing adopts a more measured approach, as the continued reception of orders for Boeing’s 777-9F allows for sustained production over the next five years. This strategy provides a smoother transition toward the eventual production of Boeing’s 777-9F.

Advertisement

B777-8F and A 350F orders as of Nov 2023


Currently, both freighter versions of these aircraft are pending. The Airbus A350, initially known for its passenger variant, is already operational in the market, catering efficiently to the passenger segment. Airbus is now extending its capabilities by developing the freighter version, scheduled for its maiden flight in 2026. Since its introduction in July 2021, Airbus has secured 39 firm orders for the A350F, with the unveiling of the inaugural aircraft’s livery at the Paris Air Show.

Advertisement

On the Boeing front, the 777-8F aircraft is undergoing a transition from the passenger to the freighter version. The cargo variant, 777-8F, is anticipated to be introduced in 2028. In contrast, the passenger version, 777-8, does not have a confirmed timeline. Qatar Airways, a major customer, has placed orders for approximately 74 aircraft, with additional orders from various other airlines, totaling around 90 aircraft as of 2023. Boeing currently leads in terms of order volume compared to Airbus.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aircraft comparison

Comparison Between Embraer Kc-390 and Airbus A400M

Comparison Between Embraer Kc-390 and Airbus A400M

In the following article, we will examine The Embraer KC 390 and the Airbus A400m are the two military aircraft models. Both serve the Military Transportation needs as well as a number of other uses for which the clients employ them. Let’s examine how the two aircraft differ from one another within its class.

Embraer KC-390

The Embraer KC-390 is a twin-engine, medium-size military transport aircraft developed and manufactured by Brazilian aerospace company Embraer. It is designed to perform a variety of missions, including cargo and troop transport, aerial refueling, search and rescue, and medical evacuation.

The aircraft Kc-390 can carry up to 26 tons of cargo, or up to 80 troops, and has a maximum range of 3,400 nautical miles (6,300 kilometers). The KC-390 made its first flight in 2015, and the Brazilian Air Force has ordered 28 aircraft.

The aircraft has been offered for export and has been ordered by Argentina, Portugal, the Czech Republic, and Columbia. How much does the KC 390 cost? By 2013, the KC-390 program had cost US$2.25 billion to develop, and the unit cost is expected to be US$50 million when production begins. This aircraft was first publicly revealed in 2014.

The cargo area of the KC-390 was 35.2 m (115 ft ) in length,11.84 m (38 ft ) in height ahead of the wing. A unique feature was a retractable pressure bulkhead that sealed the cargo cabin and retracted garage door-style into the roof. The KC-90 could transport 74 litters with attendants, 66 paratroopers, or up to 88 fully equipped troops.

Airbus A400M

The Airbus A400M Atlas is a military transport aircraft developed and manufactured by Airbus Defence and Space. It is designed to perform a variety of missions, including strategic and tactical airlift, aerial refueling, and medical evacuation. The A400M can fly to a maximum of 4,100 NM, although this reduces to 2,000 NM with its maximum 37 tonnes of payload. It is equipped with four turboprop engines and advanced avionics, including fly-by-wire technology. The A400M made its first flight in 2009, and it has been ordered by several countries, including Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom.

The aircraft has been delivered to multiple countries and used in various operations and exercises. Can the A400M carry a tank? With a basic fuel capacity of 63,500 liters (50,800 kg), which can be even further increased with additional cargo hold tanks, the A400M is the most capable tactical tanker on the market.

In addition to the ramp, the cargo bay measured 17.71 meters (58 feet) long, 4 meters (13 feet) broad, and 3.85 meters height (12 feet). The cargo bay could be equipped for carrying cargo, moving vehicles, moving troops, or evacuating patients. It could fit up to 20 one-tonne containers or pallets, nine regular pallets with 58 soldiers sitting in fold-down seats along the fuselage’s walls, 120 fully armed soldiers, 116 paratroopers, and 66 stretchers with 25 medical workers.

The Embraer KC-390 and the Airbus A400M are both military transport aircraft designed for a variety of missions, including cargo and troop transport, aerial refueling, search and rescue, and medical evacuation.

However, there are some key differences between the two aircraft:

  1. Manufacturer: The Embraer KC-390 is manufactured by Brazilian aerospace company Embraer, while the Airbus A400M is manufactured by Airbus Defence and Space.
  2. Size: The Embraer KC-390 is a medium-sized military transport aircraft, while the Airbus A400M is a larger aircraft.
  3. Engines: The Embraer KC-390 is powered by two International Aero Engines V2500-E5 turbofan engines, while the Airbus A400M is powered by four Europrop International TP400-D6 turboprop engines.
  4. Maximum Cargo Capacity: The Embraer KC-390 has a maximum cargo capacity of 26 tons, while the Airbus A400M has a maximum cargo capacity of 37 tons.
  5. Maximum Passenger Capacity: The Embraer KC-390 can carry up to 80 troops, while the Airbus A400M can carry up to 116 troops.
  6. Maximum Range: Kc-390 aircraft have a maximum range of around 3,400 nautical miles (6,300 kilometers).while Airbus A400M has 4,100 NM, although this reduces to 2,000 NM with its maximum 37 tonnes of payload.
  7. First Flight: The Embraer KC-390 made its first flight in 2015, while the Airbus A400M made its first flight in 2009.
  8. Avionics: Both aircraft are equipped with advanced avionics, including fly-by-wire technology.
  9. Operators: The Embraer KC-390 is operated by the Brazilian Air Force and other countries, while the Airbus A400M is operated by several countries, including Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom.Overall, both aircraft are highly capable military transports, but the A400M is larger, can carry more cargo and passengers, and has been in service for a longer period of time.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Advertisement

Trending