Connect with us

Aviation

New York Times story paints an inaccurate picture of Boeing South Carolina

New York Times story paints an inaccurate picture of Boeing South Carolina

This message from Brad Zaback, Vice President and general manager of the 787 Program, was sent to all Boeing South Carolina teammates Saturday, April 20.

Team,

Advertisement

The 787 program has a lot to be proud of these days. Our transition to Rate 14 continues to be the most seamless rate transition in the program’s history, and our Boeing South Carolina 787 manufacturing operations are the healthiest they’ve ever been. More importantly, our quality metrics show that we are performing at all-time high levels as well. That is a testament to each of you, demonstrating your pride and your ongoing commitment to excellence with respect to both safety and quality.

A story that posted in today’s New York Times, however, paints a skewed and inaccurate picture of the program and of our team here at Boeing South Carolina. This article features distorted information, rehashing old stories and rumors that have long ago been put to rest.

Advertisement

I want all BSC teammates to know that we invited the New York Times to visit Boeing South Carolina once they contacted us, so that they could see first-hand the great work that is done here. They declined this invitation.

The allegations of poor quality are especially offensive to me because I know the pride in workmanship that each of you pours into your work every day. I see the highest quality airplanes – airplanes that meet rigorous quality inspections and FAA standards – deliver on time on a regular basis from Boeing South Carolina, where they perform exceptionally well in service for our valued airplane customers around the world. Our customers feel the same way, and shared their own thoughts with the New York Times:

Advertisement

American Airlines said it conducted rigorous inspections of new planes before putting them into service. “We have confidence in the 787s we have in our fleet,” said Ross Feinstein, a spokesman for the airline.

In a statement, Qatar Airways said it “continues to be a long-term supporter of Boeing and has full confidence in all its aircraft and manufacturing facilities.” Note that only a portion of their quote was included in the story, and we wanted to ensure you had their full perspective: “Qatar Airways continues to be a long-term supporter of Boeing and has full confidence in all its aircraft and manufacturing facilities as a strong commitment to safety and quality is of the utmost importance to both our companies. We have over 100 Boeing aircraft in our fleet, manufactured in both Everett and Charleston, with many more to join in the coming years as part of our significant, long-term investment in the US economy.”

Advertisement

In fact, we also heard from Supernal Airlines and Norwegian in response to the story, and here’s what they told us:

Suparna Airlines: “The entire process of the aircraft delivery was very smooth. We want to thank the Boeing team in South Carolina who worked diligently with the Boeing standard and discipline to make the delivery a pleasant experience for us. The airplane has carried out more than 200 scheduled flights with total flight hours up to 500 at an operational reliability of 99.99%. We are happy with the performance of our first Dreamliner.”

Advertisement

Norwegian: “We are very satisfied with the quality and reliability of all our 33 Dreamliner, regardless of where they have been assembled.”

PAINT IS FLAKING ON AIR NEW ZEALAND’S DREAMLINERS

Advertisement

The inaccurate picture the New York Times paints is also offensive to me because they are counter to our company’s core values. Quality is the bedrock of who we are. That’s why we relentlessly focus on quality improvements and FOD elimination at all Boeing locations. No matter how good we are today, we always believe we can be even better tomorrow. That drive to be the best will never change at Boeing as we continue to strive to be a Global Industrial Champion and the leader in quality.

It’s unfortunate and disappointing that the New York Times chose to publish this misleading story. This story, however, does not define us. Our company and our customers recognize the talent, skill and dedication of this excellent Boeing South Carolina team that works together to assemble and deliver incredible airplanes. I want to leave you with a word from Kevin McAllister, Boeing Commercial Airplanes president and CEO, which was not included in full from the New York Times:

Advertisement
Advertisement

Aviation

BARK Air Unveils the World’s First Luxury Airline Exclusively for Dogs

Introducing BARK Air in collaboration with a jet charter firm, BARK, Inc. is a top worldwide omnichannel dog brand whose goal is to bring happiness to all dogs.

With BARK Air, dogs and their human friends can travel together in comfort and convenience. It’s the first air travel experience created with dogs in mind first. The private plane cost
first flights departing from New York on Thursday, May 23, are being offered for booking as of right now. Premium flights for dogs (and their humans) are also available.

Advertisement

Taking long trips with a dog can be difficult for many dog parents, especially for larger dogs who can’t fit in a carrier that fits under the front seat. Dogs suffer through the trauma of flying in cargo, are denied travel, or are confined to a duffel bag far too frequently. BARK Air private jet flights offers a more enjoyable and compassionate choice for dogs travelling with their two-legged human companions, in response to the growing need for an accessible solution to these problems.

BARK Air is a new benchmark for dogs that love to travel but have to make up with less-than-ideal travel circumstances. BARK Air embodies BARK’s dog-first ethos and award-winning customer experience. From booking to arrival, in-flight amenities, and disembarkation, dogs will genuinely be the VIPs and treated to a positively opulent, carefully planned experience by BARK Air, which has taken the white glove treatment typically associated with a human’s first-class experience and aimed all that pampering towards pups.

Advertisement

Routes will first serve the New York City metro area via Westchester County Airport, with flights to London, England via Stansted Airport (STN), and the Los Angeles area via Van Nuys (VNY). Through the cooperation, all aircraft, crew, maintenance, and insurance-related issues are handled by an Argus Platinum-rated charter business, while BARK is concentrated on designing and delivering an exceptional flying experience for dogs and their humans.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aviation

Here’s Why Popular Airlines Are removing First Class : The Reasons Unveiled

Image:Wikipedia

An airline has grown weary of its first-class seats and has made the bold decision to remove them from its upcoming aircraft orders and fleet interior upgrades.

Why has the airline chosen to take such a drastic step, and what has led to its lack of interest in maintaining a first-class experience? Join us in this video as we delve into the reasons behind the airline’s decision and explore its implications.

Advertisement

First-class seats hold a distinct identity in the travel segment, often attracting affluent individuals or celebrities seeking privacy and luxury. These passengers enjoy exclusive suites with extensive food menus and various travel amenities. Airlines have crafted their brand image around these offerings, leveraging such facilities and promotions to enhance their appeal. For instance, some airlines like Emirates provide onboard showers in their first-class cabins, while others like Singapore Airlines offer private suites resembling spacious bedrooms for their passengers.

Some popular airlines are phasing out their first-class seats from their cabins due to various reasons that have prompted them to reconsider their services.

Advertisement

Changing Traveler Preferences

Some leading airlines are ditching their first-class seats, reflecting a shift in traveler behavior. Passengers increasingly question the value of paying a premium for first class when business class offers comparable benefits. Additionally, affluent travelers often have access to private jets, reducing the exclusivity of first-class travel.

Advertisement

Egalitarian Approach to Seating

First class, once reserved for the super-rich, is losing its allure as airlines focus on providing consistent service across all cabins. The rise of business class and premium economy options has made first-class tickets less appealing to many travelers. Comfort and amenities now take precedence over traditional first-class luxuries.

Advertisement

Operational Efficiency

Maintaining multiple cabin classes adds complexity to airline operations. Eliminating first class can streamline processes such as boarding, catering, and service, improving overall efficiency. Furthermore, lighter aircraft resulting from reduced first-class cabins can lead to lower fuel consumption and emissions per passenger, addressing environmental concerns.

Advertisement

Economic Considerations

Maintaining first-class cabins entails significant expenses for airlines, including space requirements, luxurious amenities, and personalized service. High first-class fares may drive passengers to opt for private jets instead, causing potential losses for airlines.

Advertisement

Revenue Optimization

With more demand for economy and premium seats, airlines may find reallocating space from first class to other high-demand cabins more profitable. Increasing the number of passengers, rather than focusing on first class, can often yield higher revenue.

Advertisement

By considering these factors, airlines are reevaluating the role of the first class in their cabins, signaling a fundamental shift in the aviation industry’s landscape.
Environmental Impact and First-Class Seating

Concerns over environmental impact extend to the aviation industry, notably regarding the disproportionate space consumed by first-class seats, equivalent to 4-6 economy seats. This exacerbates the carbon footprint of airlines, prompting considerations for more eco-conscious practices.

Advertisement

Operational Challenges and Cost

The design and maintenance of first-class amenities pose formidable challenges for airlines. These include the deployment of exclusive cabin crew services and managing the added complexities, driving up operational costs significantly.

Advertisement

Financial Implications and Passenger Preferences

Maintaining first-class cabins proves to be financially burdensome due to their larger space requirements and luxurious amenities. Additionally, the flexibility for passengers to cancel their emirates first class seats at any time presents a risk to airlines, impacting route planning and profitability.

Advertisement

Alternative Travel Options and Passenger Behavior

High charges for first class seats may lead passengers, especially those traveling in groups, to opt for private jet bookings for a more personalized travel experience. This shift in passenger behavior highlights the need for airlines to adapt to changing preferences and maintain competitiveness in the market.

Advertisement

Maximizing Profitability Through Increased Passenger Count

Rather than persisting with a large number of underoccupied first-class seats, airlines can pivot towards a strategy focused on maximizing passenger count. By accommodating more passengers, particularly in Economy and Premium classes, airlines stand to generate higher revenue and improve profitability. This shift aligns with changing consumer preferences and market dynamics, emphasizing practicality and affordability over luxury.

Advertisement

In the near future, several major airlines, including American Airlines, United Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Lufthansa, British Airways, and Qantas, are planning to remove first-class seats from their aircraft. Although Emirates has not completely eliminated its first-class cabins, it is reducing the number of first-class seats on certain planes to prioritize the expansion of its business and economy class offerings.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aviation

UK Airports Struggle to Implement Liquid Limit Changes

UK Airports Struggle to Implement Liquid Limit Changes

As summer approaches, travelers passing through major UK airports will continue to encounter restrictions on carrying liquids in their hand luggage, as the deadline for implementing new scanners has been extended.

Despite efforts to upgrade security technology, London Gatwick, Heathrow, and Manchester airports are unlikely to have the necessary equipment in place by the previously set date of June 1st. This delay could persist for up to a year, potentially stretching until June 2025, as airports grapple with the installation process.

Advertisement

The government has granted airports individual extensions, acknowledging the challenges they face in transitioning to the new scanning technology. Consequently, passengers may still be required to remove liquids and laptops from their bags during security checks. Failure to meet deadlines will result in financial penalties imposed by the Civil Aviation Authority, as announced by the UK Department of Transport.

Chris Woodroofe, managing director at Manchester Airport said to BBC, emphasized the ongoing transition, urging passengers to adhere to the existing liquid restrictions and prepare for the possibility of continued inconvenience. While some terminals may feature the new scanning lanes, the majority are still in the process of implementation.

Advertisement

In addition to advising travelers to comply with current regulations, passengers are urged to familiarize themselves with the rules at their destination or transfer airports, as the outdated restrictions may still apply elsewhere.

Phil Forster, managing director of Teesside Airport, expressed understanding for the challenges faced by larger airports in adapting to the new technology. The next-generation scanners, equipped with computed tomography (CT) technology, offer clearer 3D images, allowing items to remain inside bags and increasing the permissible liquid limit to two liters.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Advertisement

Trending