Connect with us

Aviation

Japan to Construct Second Passenger Jet Following First’s Setback

Japan to build the 2nd passngers jet after its first one has got failure

The Japanese government is set to collaborate with a private firm to construct a new passenger jet, a project expected to require approximately USD 33 billion. The anticipated outcome of this endeavor could materialize by 2035, aiming to significantly reduce carbon emissions and establish a new standard in eco-friendly aviation.

Japan is strategically focused on developing its passenger aircraft to compete globally, following a previous unsuccessful attempt with the Mitsubishi Regional Jet, which failed to gain approval from the FAA and other aviation authorities. After years of research, the decision was made to innovate by revamping the aircraft and introducing a unique hydrogen-powered engine concept.

Advertisement

While concrete plans are yet to be finalized, discussions revolve around various propulsion technologies, including hybrid electric systems and hydrogen combustion or fuel cell technologies. Notably, hydrogen emerges as a prominent contender, with the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) emphasizing the importance of leveraging Japan’s competitive advantage in technological innovation to drive the decarbonization of air transport.

Video: The First MRJ regional Plane from Japan is scrapped in the United States

Advertisement

Numerous aerospace companies are already pioneering hydrogen-powered electric aircraft as a promising solution to combat carbon emissions. Companies such as ZeroAvia and Universal Hydrogen are at the forefront, with projects ranging from small regional planes to larger passenger aircraft, reflecting a concerted effort towards sustainable aviation.

Advertisement

In parallel, collaborations between budget airlines like EasyJet, engine manufacturers like Rolls-Royce, and industry giants like Airbus underscore the collective commitment towards developing hydrogen-powered aircraft. Airbus, for instance, aims to introduce hydrogen-powered planes into commercial service by 2035.

Despite setbacks like the failed SpaceJet aircraft program, which incurred substantial costs without achieving liftoff, Japan remains undeterred. The country’s new aircraft venture indirectly challenges competitors like China’s COMAC C919, signaling Japan’s determination to carve out a significant presence in the aerospace industry.

Advertisement

Additionally, Japan’s collaboration with Britain and Italy in developing a sixth-generation fighter jet highlights its pursuit of cutting-edge aviation technology. This advanced fighter jet, featuring Rolls-Royce engines, laser targeting systems, and three-dimensional thrust vectoring engine nozzles, represents a leap forward in military aviation capabilities.

Under an MOU agreement, Japan retains the option to export these fighter jets to allied nations, potentially reshaping the global landscape of military aircraft manufacturing and distribution. With these ambitious projects, Japan aims to assert itself as a leader in both commercial and military aviation, pushing the boundaries of innovation and sustainability in the aerospace sector.

Advertisement

Watch Video : Japan to Construct Second Passenger Jet Following First’s Setback

Advertisement

Mukundkumar Prajpathi serves as the freelance press correspondent for Jetline Marvel, specializing in technical engineering. Based in Paris, he brings a wealth of experience to his role. Prajpathi has contributed numerous research write-ups and provided media coverage for Jetline Marvel. He has also represented the company twice at the prestigious Paris Airshow and participated in various other events in France.

Advertisement

Aviation

FAA investigation: Passenger seated in Captain’s seat inside cockpit at cruising altitude

FAA investigation: Passenger seated in Captain's seat inside cockpit at cruising altitude

A viral video capturing a startling moment aboard a United Airlines charter flight from Denver to Toronto has triggered a federal investigation.

The footage, initially shared on social media by Hensley Meulens, the hitting coach for the Colorado Rockies baseball team, depicts a member of the coaching staff seated in one of the pilot seats while the aircraft was in mid-flight.

Advertisement

In his caption, Meulens expressed gratitude to the captain and first officer for allowing him this unusual experience. The video, filmed by another passenger, reveals the cockpit door open, and at one point, a third passenger briefly enters the flight deck. Alarmingly, during this time, the captain was absent from the cockpit.

Despite the flight being a private charter operated by United Airlines, company and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations strictly prohibit passengers from entering the cockpit during flight or leaving the flight deck unsecured.

Advertisement

United Airlines swiftly responded, expressing deep concern over the incident. A spokesperson emphasized that the video depicted an unauthorized person in the flight deck at cruising altitude with the autopilot engaged, constituting a clear violation of safety and operational policies.

The FAA confirmed that it is actively investigating the incident, highlighting that unauthorized access to the flight deck during flight is a violation of federal regulations. The agency assured that it is taking the matter seriously and will conduct a thorough examination to ensure compliance with aviation safety standards.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aviation

Israel vs Iran Military Power Comparison: Which country is stronger?

Explore the comparative analysis of Israel and Iran’s military capabilities. Delve into the strengths and strategic considerations of each nation to assess potential outcomes in the event of conflict.

Israel vs Iran Military Power Comparison: Which country is stronger?

In this article, we’ll delve into the power dynamics between Iran and Israel. With Israel launching multiple attacks on various Middle Eastern regions, both countries have initiated defensive measures against each other.

We’ll explore the respective features of both nations, although it’s important to note that the accuracy of the report may not align precisely with information from public domain sources.

Advertisement

Global Military Index ranking

According to the Military Power Index, Iran holds the 14th position while Israel holds the 17th. This index provides a direct comparison of the armed forces of the two nations. It suggests that Iran surpasses Israel in terms of manpower, as well as in the number of tanks and armed vehicles.

In the ongoing conflict, the world is divided into two sides: Israel and Iran. Countries in the Asian region, such as Russia, the Middle East, and China, strongly support Iran, as they are its main military suppliers. On the other hand, Israel receives its main backing from the United States and European countries.

Advertisement

Iran and Isreal Distance

Both countries, separated by neighboring nations like Iraq and Jordan, face a considerable distance between them. For attacks across such distances, they heavily rely on potent weaponry, especially through air-to-ground assaults.

Both possess formidable defense aircraft and military tanks, which undoubtedly influence the war’s outcome.

Advertisement

Given that the distance between Jerusalem and Tehran is approximately 1,850 kilometers (1,149 miles), conducting attacks over such long distances requires aircraft with extensive flying ranges.

Israel may lack the inherent power to reach Iran directly, necessitating mid-air refueling or the use of long-range missiles to execute such operations.

Advertisement

Which military is stronger Israel or Iran?


In terms of Israel, it boasts advanced technology in the defense sector, with a strong focus on both business and innovation. It serves as a key supplier of guided rockets and various critical weapons to the defense market. Many domestically-built military tankers and advanced weaponry have proven their efficacy on the battlefield.

Advertisement

Israel stands out as a significant defense equipment supplier, particularly due to strong support from NATO countries like the US, Europe, and the UK. This backing provides access to the most advanced fighter jets and technologies, including 5th-generation fighters.

Israel vs Iran Military Power Comparison: Which country is stronger?
Army Military Apache Helicopter Attack Chopper

Conversely, Iran faces challenges in acquiring the latest weaponry, relying heavily on Russian and Chinese technology, along with seized equipment from Iraq and Afghanistan, predominantly sourced from the United States.

Iran’s domestic development of aircraft has been limited, and maintenance is hindered by parts shortages. Additionally, disruptions in supply chains, particularly due to the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, pose significant hurdles for Iran in acquiring military equipment.

Advertisement

However, Iran has made upgrades, particularly in ground-to-air attack munitions procured from Russia. These include long-range ballistic missiles capable of inflicting heavy damage on enemy territory.

Advertisement

How many fighter jets are in Israel & Iran?


When comparing air attack capabilities, Israel’s air force surpasses Iran’s in terms of aircraft quantity. According to the Global Firepower Index, Israel holds a clear advantage in air power. The Israeli army boasts a total of 612 fighter jets, whereas Iran possesses 551.

Advertisement

Israel operates a fleet of 75 Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II aircraft. Additionally, they possess 58 Boeing F-15 Eagle jets. Moreover, Israel has 25 Boeing F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft in its arsenal.

Israel vs Iran Military Power Comparison: Which country is stronger?

Furthermore, the Israeli Air Force boasts 343 General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon jets. Lastly, they maintain a fleet of 30 Boeing AH-64 Apache helicopters.

Israel possesses numerous advanced fighter jets and military aircraft equipped with some of the most lethal weapons available.

Advertisement


Iran’s fighter aircraft inventory includes the Mikoyan MiG-29 acquired in 1991, 40 Grumman F-14 Tomcats, 20 Su-22s, 24 Chengdu J-7s, 23 Mirage F1s, and 60 McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom IIs, showcasing its commitment to diverse defense capabilities.


Iran’s inventory primarily consists of outdated aircraft, many of which are around 20 years old. However, according to the Iran Defense Ministry, all aircraft are reportedly in good condition and deemed capable of meeting the challenges of any conflict

Advertisement

Advertisement

Iran’s and Israel’s Military Capabilities and personnel

According to the latest report, Israel’s active personnel count stands at 169,500, with an additional 465,000 individuals in reserve. Israel implements a significant policy whereby most young citizens are mandated to join the defense forces for several years to acquire skill sets essential for serving as reserved forces, ready to mobilize whenever required for defensive or offensive operations.

In comparison to Israel, Iran boasts a larger ground forces personnel count. Iran’s military comprises approximately 610,000 active-duty personnel, supplemented by 350,000 reserve and trained individuals available for mobilization as necessary.

Advertisement

This substantial manpower brings Iran’s total military strength to roughly 960,000 personnel, excluding figures for the Law Enforcement Command or Basij.

Advertisement

Does Israel have an air defense system?


Israel has developed some of the most advanced air defense systems globally, a response to the consistent threat of attacks from neighboring nations. The Iron Dome, renowned for its effectiveness, stands out as a prime example.

This smart air defense system has successfully intercepted numerous unexpected attacks on Israeli soil, with its capability to destroy incoming missiles mid-flight. Operating on constant alert, the Iron Dome swiftly neutralizes threats whenever they arise within the country’s borders.

Advertisement

Furthermore, Israel has invested heavily in enhancing its defense radar systems, enabling early detection of enemy activities from considerable distances. Pioneering in drone technology, Israel boasts the Heron pilotless planes, capable of enduring flights lasting over 30 hours, facilitating operations even in remote locations.

Additionally, Israel’s Delilah loitering munition, with an approximate range of 250 km (155 miles), though limited for operations beyond the Gulf, can be strategically deployed closer to Iran’s border by the Israeli Air Force, bridging the distance gap effectively.

Advertisement


Iran has collaborated with Russia and China to develop several air defense systems, bolstering its capabilities. Among these systems are multiple medium-range defense systems, such as the Arman, Tactical Sayyad, and Khordad-15. These systems are designed to safeguard Iranian airspace from threats at distances of up to 200 km (124 miles) and varying altitudes.

One notable system, the Arman, was unveiled in November 2022. It is strategically mounted on military trucks, enabling swift deployment within minutes to address potential threats effectively.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aircraft comparison

Osprey is faster than Chinook helicopter ?

Osprey is faster than Chinook helicopter ?


In this article, we’ll delve into two distinct military aircraft that have played essential roles in United Air Force defense. Both aircraft have unique characteristics in terms of usage and flying capabilities. One is capable of vertical takeoff and flies like an aircraft, while the other is a helicopter with two tandem rotors. Let’s explore each of these aircraft in detail.

The speed of helicopters can vary depending on several factors such as their design, engine power, payload, and mission requirements. Generally speaking, the Osprey (specifically referring to the V-22 Osprey) is faster than the Chinook helicopter.

Advertisement

The V-22 Osprey is a tiltrotor aircraft, meaning it can take off and land vertically like a helicopter but also tilt its rotors forward to fly like an airplane. This design allows the Osprey to achieve higher speeds compared to conventional helicopters. The cruising speed of the V-22 Osprey is around 241 knots (277 mph or 446 km/h).

On the other hand, the Chinook helicopter, such as the Boeing CH-47 Chinook, has a cruising speed typically around 170 knots (196 mph or 315 km/h). While the Chinook is a highly capable and versatile helicopter known for its heavy-lift capabilities and reliability, it generally operates at lower speeds compared to the Osprey.

Advertisement

The comparison between an Osprey and a Chinook helicopter involves contrasting two distinct aircraft with different designs, capabilities, and purposes:

MV-22 Osprey details:


The Osprey has garnered significant controversy since its inaugural flight, primarily stemming from issues associated with its tiltrotor design. These challenges have led to several incidents and crashes, resulting in the tragic loss of pilots and crew members and prompting multiple groundings of the aircraft.

Advertisement

However, efforts are underway to address these technical issues swiftly, with plans to rectify the problems and resume flights promptly. Despite these setbacks, the Osprey remains crucial in operational contexts, offering enhanced capabilities for transporting both cargo and crew members, underscoring its pivotal role in various missions.

Except for the United States and Japan, no other country has been granted authorization to utilize the Osprey aircraft. Its unique design and specialized nature, being built in the United States, likely necessitate governmental permission for export to other nations.

Advertisement

The Osprey stands out for its groundbreaking design and innovation, featuring the ability to transition from vertical to horizontal rotor positions while also generating thrust like a conventional aircraft.

  1. MV-22 Osprey:
    • The MV-22 Osprey is a tiltrotor aircraft, meaning it can take off and land like a helicopter but fly like a fixed-wing aircraft once airborne.
    • It’s primarily used for vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL), troop transport, cargo transport, and aerial refueling.
    • The Osprey has a unique ability to combine the vertical lift capability of a helicopter with the speed and range of a turboprop aircraft.
    • It can carry up to 24 troops or 20,000 pounds of internal cargo and has a top speed of around 315 miles per hour (507 km/h).
    • The Osprey is utilized by the U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Air Force Special Operations Command, and other military forces around the world.

Boeing CH-47 Chinook:

The Chinook helicopter stands as a testament to unparalleled engineering and innovation, making it one of the most distinctive aircraft ever constructed. Since its inception, no other nation has attempted to replicate its singular design, owing to the extraordinary precision and aerospace technology required for its construction. This helicopter, revered as an engineering marvel, has become a staple in major battlegrounds, renowned for its exceptional capacity to transport troops and cargo to any destination. Remarkably versatile, it operates seamlessly on both land and water surfaces, boasting an integrated floating system that enhances its capabilities even further.

Advertisement

Selected countries have been granted permission to utilize the Chinook helicopter, showcasing its global appeal and strategic importance. Furthermore, ongoing development efforts are underway to enhance the speed and carrying capacity of the next version of this iconic aircraft. Renowned for its exceptional safety record, the Chinook stands as one of the safest helicopters in operation today, with a remarkably low incidence of crashes. Its versatility is unmatched, making it an invaluable asset for operations in diverse terrains and environments.

  1. Boeing CH-47 Chinook:
    • The Chinook is a tandem rotor helicopter, known for its distinctive twin-rotor design.
    • It’s a heavy-lift helicopter primarily used for troop transportation, artillery emplacement, battlefield resupply, and various other missions.
    • The Chinook has a rear loading ramp for cargo and troops, making it well-suited for quick loading and unloading.
    • It can carry up to 55 troops or 24,000 pounds of cargo internally and has a top speed of around 170 miles per hour (274 km/h).
    • The Chinook is widely used by the U.S. Army and various other military forces worldwide, including the UK, Canada, and others.

Advertisement

Comparison:

  • Design: The Osprey is a tiltrotor aircraft, while the Chinook is a tandem-rotor helicopter.
  • Speed and Range: The Osprey has a higher top speed and longer range compared to the Chinook due to its fixed-wing aircraft capabilities.
  • Payload Capacity: The Chinook generally has a higher payload capacity for both troops and cargo compared to the Osprey.
  • Versatility: While both aircraft are versatile in their own right, Osprey’s ability to take off and land vertically as well as fly at high speeds over long distances gives it a unique advantage in certain scenarios. However, the Chinook’s ability to carry larger payloads makes it better suited for heavy lift operations.
  • Cost and Maintenance: Maintenance and operating costs may vary between the two aircraft, with tiltrotor technology typically being more complex than traditional helicopter designs.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Advertisement

Trending