Connect with us

Aerospace

How does the ATR-42 water crash land in comparison to the A320 and B737?

This might be the main factor in the 19 people being trapped under the aircraft. #PrecisionAir #Crash #ATR42-500

How does the ATR-42 water crash land in comparison to the A320 and B737?

A passenger plane flight PW-494 from Tanzania crashed into Lake Victoria as it attempted to land in the lakeside town of Bukoba, killing at least 19 of its passengers. When the accident happened at roughly 08:53 local time, the ATR42-500, 5H-PWF, was en route from Dar es Salaam to Bukoba. The flight carried 39 passengers (38 Adults and 1 Infant) together with 4 crew members. The families and relatives of the passengers and crew members who were engaged in this unfortunate tragedy are offered the utmost sympathy by Precision Air.

10 things about Boeing 737 max aircraft.(Opens in a new browser tab)

Advertisement

The incident took place today during a flight over Mwanza from Dar es Salaam (DAR) to Bukoba (BKZ) (MWZ). On the 640-mile journey, the first flight travelled 529 miles, and the second, 111. There were 39 passengers and four crew members among the 43 people in the aeroplane (the ATR 42-500 has a capacity for 48 passengers). The airline operates about 10 ATR turboprops, including the ATR 42 and ATR 72.

Since the Precision Air ATR 42-500 crashed just a few hundred feet from land, local fishermen and rescue workers have been frantically trying to save all on board. Unluckily, 19 of the 43 passengers have been officially pronounced dead, with several of them still trapped within the plane. Tragedies like this serve as a warning that anything can go catastrophically wrong even though flying is incredibly safe. Sadly heartbreaking.

Advertisement

How should I proceed if an aircraft is about to crash? (Opens in a new browser tab)

How does the ATR-42 crash land in comparison to the A320 and B737?

Due to severe weather, Precision Air’s ATR 42-500 overshot the runway and ditched in the lake during the approach. However, there are various technical reasons why some of the passengers can’t escape right away. In this article, we’ll discuss how landing on an ATR 42 differs from landing on an A320 or B737.

Advertisement
In an aircraft, the wing configuration is crucial. Low-wing mounting is used on the A320 and B737 at or below the fuselage’s bottom. This means that if an aircraft is approached appropriately on the water surface, there will be adequate room to open the door and people can evacuate as soon as feasible. It is also conceivable for a crashed aircraft to float for a period of time due to the wing size sharing on the water surface.

US Airways Flight 1549

If remember correctly, US Airways Flight 1549’s Airbus A320 hit a flock of birds shortly after takeoff from New York and lost all engine power. Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles guided the plane to a ditch in the Hudson River close to Midtown Manhattan since they were unable to make an emergency landing at any airport due to their low altitude. Only a small number of the 155 people sustained serious injuries since nearby boats were able to save everyone.
The ATR aircraft’s turboprop engines are mostly used for regional connectivity. Compared to other jets like the A320, B737, or E170 series, this aircraft can take off and land on a shorter runway because of its design. The shape and style of an aircraft’s wings might increase survival chances. ATR 42-500 from Precision Air On the upper fuselage, it is mounted with a high wing. relates to a wing positioned on a protrusion (like the cabin roof) over the top of the main fuselage, as opposed to the shoulder wing. In this scenario, as the aircraft sinks in the water due to the weight of the wings and the engines, the fuselage will sink but the wings will float for a while. One of the biggest risks is attempting to open the door because of the water pressure; furthermore, emergency windows are opened from the inside of the aircraft instead of the outside.
however, there is still room to open the emergency window door. However, if it does, water may start to enter the cabin because of the lower atmospheric pressure, which could quickly cause the aircraft to become submerged in water. Since the ATR aeroplane is ditched to water, it will be difficult for anyone to escape. The only thing that can make evacuations successful is pre-flight preparation ditching.
It would be excellent if the ATR could adjust the cabin roof with the door latch open during the water landing scene to assist passengers from the aircraft’s top roof. That is the only way the evacuation of this aeroplane could be done best.

The 19 passengers who are trapped in the aircraft may be affected significantly by this reason.

Even if the aircraft doors are opened, there are still a lot of chances that they are locked, giving passengers time to flee before the cabin is submerged. The majority of the passengers in the Precision Air ATR 42-500 were trapped inside, and neighbouring fishermen were desperately trying to save them. However, they did a great job at evacuating the passengers, and some of them eventually emerged and entered the boats.
Authorities have been working to pull the plane out of the water and move it closer to land in addition to attempting to evacuate the passengers. The tail was the only portion of the fuselage that was ever visible. The rescue efforts have caused the jet to partially climb out of the water. One thousand people used ropes to tie a rope to the tail of the aeroplane and pull it out of the water.
According to the Wikipedia source, the ATR42 reported 12 crashes, including the Precision Air ATR 42-500 water landing crash, which was a first of its kind. The manufacturer of ATR aircraft has displayed a demonstration film for the evacuation procedure. It is crucial that the passengers and the crew get ready for the crash landing and aftermath.
When an aeroplane tries to land because of terrible weather, it might not be aware that it could overrun the runway and land on water. The crew will have adequate time to prepare for a crash landing if they are fully aware of the situation. Although the Precision Air ATR 42-500 pilots successfully controlled the landing, they were unable to evacuate the wreckage. Investigations will eventually uncover the complete details of what specifically led to the aircraft’s crash landing.
what do you think about the Precision Air ATR 42-500 crash Post a comment and let us know.

He is an aviation journalist and the founder of Jetline Marvel. Dawal gained a comprehensive understanding of the commercial aviation industry.  He has worked in a range of roles for more than 9 years in the aviation and aerospace industry. He has written more than 1700 articles in the aerospace industry. When he was 19 years old, he received a national award for his general innovations and holds the patent. He completed two postgraduate degrees simultaneously, one in Aerospace and the other in Management. Additionally, he authored nearly six textbooks on aviation and aerospace tailored for students in various educational institutions. jetlinem4(at)gmail.com

Aerospace

Which is bigger 777x or 787 aircraft ?

Which is bigger 777x or 787 aircraft ?

The 777X is a new series of the Boeing 777 family and is designed to be larger and more efficient than its predecessor. It features two variants: the 777-8 and the 777-9, being the larger of the two.

The Boeing 777X emerges as the larger sibling within the Boeing family, representing a significant leap forward in both size and efficiency. Comprising two variants, the 777-8 and the 777-9, the latter takes the crown as the larger of the two. With its expansive fuselage and impressive wingspan, the 777X is tailored for long-range journeys and boasts a substantial passenger capacity.

Advertisement

On the other hand, the Boeing 787, affectionately known as the Dreamliner, occupies a niche in the market as a smaller yet formidable aircraft designed for medium to long-range flights. Its distinguishing feature lies in its composite fuselage, a technological marvel that renders it lighter and more fuel-efficient compared to conventional aluminum counterparts. The Boeing 777X is larger than the Boeing 787 aircraft.

When it comes to passenger capacity, the 777-9 reigns supreme, typically accommodating a sizeable contingent of 400-425 passengers in its standard configuration. In contrast, the 787, with its more modest dimensions, typically carries between 240-290 passengers, depending on the variant and layout.

Advertisement

One of the remarkable innovations introduced with the 777X is its folding wingtips, a feature designed to address the logistical challenges of accommodating such a large aircraft in conventional airport gates. These folding wingtips enable the 777X to retract its wings, allowing it to fit into gates designed for smaller aircraft while still reaping the benefits of an extended wingspan during flight, thereby enhancing fuel efficiency and operational flexibility

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aerospace

China Secures Production Certificate for Mass Production of Pilotless eVTOL Aircraft

China Secures Production Certificate for Mass Production of Pilotless eVTOL Aircraft
EHang

The first passenger-carrying pilotless electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft in the world, the EH216-S, has received the Production Certificate for its eVTOL aircraft from the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC).

This is a significant milestone for EHang Holdings Limited, the leading UAM technology platform company in the world. This outstanding accomplishment is another big step towards mass manufacturing for the eVTOL aircraft and the ensuing commercial operations, building on the ground-breaking acquisition of the Type Certificate and the Standard Airworthiness Certificate for the EH216-S.

Advertisement

The PC is a crucial certificate that the aircraft maker receives from the CAAC, the country’s aviation authority. By obtaining this certificate, EHang has demonstrated that it has set up a quality management system for mass production that satisfies the airworthiness regulation standards set forth by the CAAC, and the company has been given permission to continue producing mass quantities.

It is also a strong guarantee of the calibre of the goods made by EHang. Raw materials, supplier management, manufacturing organisation, production quality control, aircraft pre-delivery test, after-sales repair and maintenance, etc. are all included in the mass production quality management system for the EH216-S.

Advertisement

To ensure that every aircraft and its components that roll off the production line strictly adhere to the approved type design and safety requirements, the system sets clear guidelines and documentation for every step in the production procedure. This ensures comprehensive traceability and safety control.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aerospace

Four Airbus A380 Superjumbos lined up to be scrapped

EASA Proposes AD for Airbus A380 Wing Rib Foot Cracks

In a strategic move aimed at reclaiming valuable resources from the iconic Airbus A380 aircraft, VAS Aero Services and Dr. Peters Group have announced a significant collaboration.

This partnership marks a milestone in aviation logistics and aftermarket services, with four of these colossal planes slated for teardown and redistribution of used serviceable material (USM).

Advertisement

The venture between VAS Aero Services, renowned for its expertise in aircraft dismantlement, and Dr. Peters Group, a prominent Germany-based investment fund management firm, underscores a commitment to sustainable aviation practices. This isn’t their first foray into scrapping A380s; their successful partnership has already seen the dismantlement of these aircraft, making them pioneers in this niche.

Under the agreement, the latest consignment brings the tally to eight A380s entrusted to VAS by Dr. Peters Group. Managing Director Christian Mailly of Dr. Peters Group emphasized the trust placed in VAS, citing their unparalleled capabilities in dismantlement and aftermarket sales network. It’s a strategic move in response to the growing demand for quality USM parts, particularly with the resurgence in reliance on the A380.

Advertisement

Notably, the teardown process will be carried out at various locations, optimizing the positioning of harvested parts to cater to different markets. While some parts will be positioned in Europe to support operators in the region and the Middle East, others will remain in the Asia-Pacific region. This meticulous strategy ensures efficient access to spare parts, benefiting MROs and airlines across these markets.

The decision to retire these A380s comes at a time when operators are reassessing fleet strategies amidst evolving market dynamics. Despite initial plans for quick retirement due to the emergence of more fuel-efficient alternatives, factors such as a rebound in long-haul demand and delays in new widebody deliveries have prompted operators to reconsider. The A380, with its unique capacity and capabilities, presents a practical solution for short-term capacity management.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Advertisement

Trending