Connect with us

Aerospace

Can the J20 from China match the American F-22 ? Let’s look at it Comparison.

The J20 from China surpasses the F22 from America. Let’s look at it Comparison.

In this article, we’ll compare the J 20 which was made in China to the F 22 which was made in the USA.

  • China’s J 20

Beginning in early 1990, the J-20 program was carried out by the Chengdu Aerospace Corporation in 2008, and on January 11, 2011, it had its first flight. eleven years ago Additionally, this aircraft started operating service in 2017. Currently, Chengdu has produced close to 150 aircraft.

The J-20 is the third operational fifth-generation stealth fighter in the world, following the F-22 and F-35.

Advertisement

An adaptation of that can be found in the J20. The newest model, the J 20S, features thrust vectoring control technology, giving the pilot a major advantage for quick action and aircraft escape from different angles. The newest aircraft also has a Loyal Wingman system that enables the two pilots to cooperate to achieve the goal. In addition to learning the aircraft, a twin-seat configuration may have a few advantages in pilot training and strike missions.

F-22 Raptor jet sets new record, 28 air-to-air missiles loaded & fired(Opens in a new browser tab)

Advertisement
  • American F 22

The F-22 can fly at sustained supersonic speeds and can reach a maximum height of 10 miles. The “Supercruise” feature of the F-22 allows it to fly faster than Mach 1.5 without utilizing afterburners. The F-22 Raptor can accelerate quickly and perform razor-sharp turns even at high speeds.

Comparison of global 7500 v/s Gulfstream 700(Opens in a new browser tab)

The F-22 fighter jet’s weapons are primarily designed to be used against airborne targets. It’s crucial to realize that the pilot is capable of carrying out standoff strikes on targets on the ground. The US F-22’s lethal long-range air-to-air and air-to-ground ordnance is one of its numerous advantages. The stealth technology used by the F-22 fighter allows it to operate practically radar-undetected.

Advertisement

The F-22, a fighter jet of the fifth generation, flew for the first time on September 7, 1997, and made its premiere in 2005. The export of this aircraft was prohibited due to technological confidentiality. Additionally, a costly budget program forced the end of this aircraft’s production in 2011. Although this was the case, Lockheed Martin upgraded their technology to stay up with the most recent fighter jets. Only 195 aircraft had been built up to this point.

  • The J20 has the option of a single or two seats, whereas the F 22 has a single crew.
  • The J 20 is 69.7 feet long, whereas the F 22 is 62 feet long.
  • The J 20’s wingspan is 42.8 feet, whereas the F 22’s is 44 feet.
  • The J 20 is 15.5 feet tall while the F 22 is 16.8 feet tall.
  • The J 20 weighs 17,000 kg empty, compared to 19,700 kg for the F 22.
  • The J 20 can carry 37,000 kg, whereas the F 22 can carry up to 38,000 kg.
  • The F 22 has a maximum fuel capacity of 12,000 kg, whereas the J 20 also has this capability.
  • The F-22 is powered by two Pratt & Whitney turbofan engines that provide a maximum thrust of 116 KN and a maximum afterburner thrust of 156 KN.
  • The Chinese-built 2 Shenyang WS-10c afterburning engine that powers J 20 generates 142 Kn of thrust afterburner.
  • The J 20 has a mach speed of Mach 2.0, which is 2,414 km/hr, while the F 22 has a speed of 2,695 km/h or a mach speed of 2.25.
  • F-22 has an external fuel tank and can travel 3,000 kilometers or more.
  • J 20 features an external fuel tank and a 5,500 km range.
  • The J 20 has a 2,000 km combat range, compared to the F 22’s 850 km.
  • The operational ceiling for each aircraft is 66,000 feet.

F22 Armament :

  • The F-22 has an internal bay with a 6 AIM, an AMRAAM, and a 2 AIM sidewinder loadout for air-to-air missions, as well as a single 20 mm Vulcan rotary cannon with a 480-round capacity.
  • Two JDAM explosives can be transported by it for air-to-ground missions.
  • Two AIMs and two sidewinders.
  • It includes 4 hardpoints for weapons under the wing pylon station and 4 external hardpoints for AIM Amraam weapons.
  • The F-22 may be equipped with a wide range of weaponry.
  • It is equipped with APG radar, which has a narrow beam and can identify things at 150 miles and targets more than 250 miles away.

J 20 Armament :

  • J 20 contains a missile launch detector in addition to a radar warning receiver with a 460 km larger detection range. It has Flare to protect itself from IR missiles.
  • It has an internal weapons compartment with an 11,000 kg maximum armament capacity.
  • The PL 10, 12, 15, 21, and LS 6 Short to Long-Range AAM missiles are included in this, in addition to anti-radiation missiles.
  • It also has four under-wing pylons that can hold drop tanks.
  • It possesses an active electronic scanning array radar.
  • It has an EOTS 86 electro-targeting system and an infrared search and track system.

 

Advertisement

He is an aviation journalist and the founder of Jetline Marvel. Dawal gained a comprehensive understanding of the commercial aviation industry.  He has worked in a range of roles for more than 9 years in the aviation and aerospace industry. He has written more than 1700 articles in the aerospace industry. When he was 19 years old, he received a national award for his general innovations and holds the patent. He completed two postgraduate degrees simultaneously, one in Aerospace and the other in Management. Additionally, he authored nearly six textbooks on aviation and aerospace tailored for students in various educational institutions. jetlinem4(at)gmail.com

Aerospace

The LCA Tejas Aircraft Crash: Understanding the Reasons – Air Marshal GS Bedi’s Perspective

The LCA Tejas Aircraft Crash: Understanding the Reasons - Air Marshal GS Bedi's Perspective

Air Marshal GS Bedi, a renowned fighter jet pilot and experienced crew member, recently participated in a YouTube interview with Def Talks hosted by Aadi. During the interview, he provided insights into the recent Tejas aircraft crash in Rajasthan, which marks one of the first crashes involving an aircraft from the Tejas family since its production commenced 20 years ago.

Numerous questions have emerged regarding the circumstances surrounding the Tejas aircraft crash and the potential causes of failure. Air Marshal Bedi adeptly addressed these concerns by outlining possible scenarios that could have led to the crash. His expertise shed light on the complexities involved in such incidents and provided valuable perspective on the aviation community’s understanding of the event.

Advertisement

At the outset, Tejas lacked a simulator and a trainer aircraft for initial training. However, pilots were provided with simulation trials before flying the Tejas aircraft. Initial reviews indicated stability during flight, with the aircraft maintaining a straight glide. However, there was an incident where the aircraft experienced an engine malfunction, prompting the pilot to eject safely.

Pilot Safe Ejections

The decision to eject was made as a precautionary measure, considering the aircraft’s low altitude and steep descent angle. With the aircraft’s altitude dropping rapidly, attempting to balance and land it was deemed too risky. Ejecting ensured the pilot’s safety, as deploying a parachute at such low altitudes could have been disastrous.

Advertisement

He chose to eject to ensure a safer distance from the ground. The aircraft is at an angle of less than 3 degrees during the approach. At a height of 100 meters, the aircraft is nearly 20 times its length away from the ground. This means the touchdown point will be approximately 4 kilometers ahead.

However, as the altitude decreases, the approach becomes too short due to the rapid descent rate. Consequently, the pilot opts to eject rather than attempt to stabilize the aircraft for a ground landing. If he had not ejected, there’s a high probability that his parachute would have deployed at that low altitude.

Advertisement

LCA Tejas engine Issue

Investigations revealed the engine malfunction was likely due to lubrication issues or other technical faults. Such split-second decisions underscore the potentially catastrophic outcomes that can result from technical failures.

The pilot involved was highly experienced and well-trained for airshow displays, suggesting timely decision-making. Nevertheless, accidents can stem from technical glitches, human errors, or unforeseen circumstances like bird strikes.

Advertisement

Air Marshal Bedi emphasized the importance of pilots being trained for emergency situations, including ejecting from the aircraft when control is lost. Despite advancements in technology, technical issues remain unpredictable, necessitating ongoing learning and improvements in aircraft systems.

Today, the Tejas mk1A aircraft completed its inaugural flight at the Bangalore station, marking the dawn of a new, advanced version of the Tejas aircraft. This iteration boasts enhanced avionics and improved aircraft structure.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aerospace

China is secretly testing its next-generation medium combat helicopter Z21

China is secretly testing its next-generation medium combat helicopter Z21

China consistently keeps aviation enthusiasts surprised with its advancements in fighter jets and other aircraft. Leading the pack in Asia, China continuously pushes boundaries in developing domestically-built aircraft.

Recently, images circulating on the internet reveal China’s latest creation, the Z-21 helicopter. Resembling its predecessor, the Z-10, this helicopter boasts enhanced fighter capabilities. The emergence of these images sparks questions regarding the fate of plans to acquire Russian-made Ka-52K attack helicopters, particularly the naval version.

Advertisement

Observing the helicopter in flight, it shares design elements with the Harbin Z-10, notably in the front fuselage and cockpit canopy. The wing stubs for weapon mounts exhibit similar shapes, though with less pronounced angular features. With a tandem seating arrangement, the Z-21 also draws comparisons to the Mil Mi-28, featuring an elongated body with five rotor blades and weapon bays on its sides.

The unveiling of the Z-21 has triggered speculation about its potential role in future military operations. Analysts suggest that beyond its firepower, its introduction could signal significant technological advancements. There’s particular interest in whether China will incorporate a ‘manned-unmanned teaming’ system akin to later Apache models, enabling the Z-21 to control armed drones for reconnaissance and attacks, reducing risks to the helicopter itself.

Advertisement

The emergence of the Z-21 underscores China’s increasing military prowess and its commitment to developing cutting-edge weaponry. Its deployment and capabilities will be closely monitored, especially concerning regional security dynamics.

The helicopter presents a significant challenge to American-built Apache and other medium helicopters, boasting superior capacity for flying at higher altitudes and more powerful speed and combat capabilities, thus enhancing its effectiveness on the battlefield. On the other hand, amidst ongoing Indian border tensions, this aircraft is poised to play a crucial role in surveillance along the sensitive China border and beyond.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aerospace

Qantas Airbus A330 Makes Safe Landing After Engine Blowout

Woman spends tortuous three months trying to resolve huge Qantas errors

A Qantas Airbus A330 Aircraft, flight number QF781, has landed safely without incident in
Perth after the passengers on the Perth-bound flight reported hearing a ‘loud bang’ from one
side of the twin-engined plane engine. The Airbus A330 aircraft made a priority landing at
Perth Airport around 9:37pm local time on 25 March, arriving approximately 52 minutes
behind schedule.


Upon landing, emergency services met with the aircraft on the tarmac. However, the aircraft
taxied to the gate without assistance, with the passengers disembarking normally.
The ‘loud bang’ heard by passengers happened due to a mid-air engine blowout, therefore
resulting in the pilots having to manually shut off the affected engine, together with
requesting a priority landing into Perth Airport. Qantas also added in a statement that the
Airbus A330 aircraft was designed to operate with one engine too.

Advertisement


Qantas QF781 is a daily scheduled flight from Melbourne to Perth, utilising the Airbus A330
on the route. The Aircraft in question is VH-EBA, an approximately 21 years aircraft,
equipped with 2 GE CF6 engines according to airfleets.net. The Airbus A330 have been a
frequent regional workhorse in Qantas’ fleet, connecting major australian cities with major
destinations within Asia. the Airbus A330 is also used on high-density domestic routes,
similar to QF781, from Melbourne to Perth.

Advertisement

Engine Issues – Should you be concerned?


While engine issues are highly uncommon due to the stringent checks and quality control on
each component within the engine, there might still be exceptional occasions where such
incidents happen. However, while recognising the risks of dual engines, Aircraft
Manufacturers and Organisations have actually came up with standards so as to ensure that
an aircraft can also land on a single engine, similar to what we saw on QF781.


One of the most well known standard is Extended-range Twin-engine Operations
Performance Standards (ETOPS) which is an acronym for twin-engine operation in an
airspace further than one hour from a diversion airport at a designated one engine
inoperable speed. This ensures that twin-engined aircraft could safely operate routes over
water or remote land without an alternative airport near the flight path, which once required
aircraft with 3 or 4 engines to fly on that route.

Advertisement


In this case, the Airbus A330 has been certified to fly ‘Beyond ETOPS 180’, and have
received ETOPS 240 certification, which is a certification to enable the twin-engined aircraft
to fly for up to a maximum of 240 minutes with 1 engine inoperative in a cruise condition.
Currently, most twin-engined widebody aircraft in operation would generally have an ETOPS
certification of at least ETOPS 180, with the new Airbus A321LR also having ETOPS 180
certification, therefore enabling the narrowbody to fly long haul flights.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aerospace

Boeing CEO Resigns Amid 737 MAX Crisis, Ignites Management Overhaul

Boeing CEO Resigns Amid 737 MAX Crisis, Ignites Management Overhaul

Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun has announced his resignation amidst the ongoing 737 MAX crisis, signaling a significant top management shakeup at the aerospace giant.

While Calhoun will continue leading the company until the end of 2024, his decision comes amid mounting pressure following a series of setbacks, including the recent incident involving an Alaska Airlines flight. This departure coincides with the retirement of Boeing Commercial President and CEO Stan Deal, who is succeeded by Stephanie Pope, the current Chief Operating Officer.

Advertisement

The announcement, made by Larry Kellner, boeing products chairman, outlines a broader restructuring within the company’s leadership. Steve Mollenkopf, a Boeing director since 2020 and former CEO of Qualcomm, will take over as chairman and lead the board in selecting a new CEO. This strategic move comes at a critical juncture as boeing airplanes
faces intense regulatory scrutiny and production constraints due to safety and quality issues.

The market’s initial response to the news was positive, with Boeing’s shares rising by 2 percent before regular trading. However, the boeing aircraft company stock had experienced a significant decline earlier in the year, reflecting investor concerns about boeing distribution aviall the ongoing challenges and uncertainties surrounding the 737 MAX program.

Advertisement

Calhoun stressed the company’s commitment to transparency, safety, and quality in a letter to employees.“We must continue to respond to this accident with humility and complete transparency. We also must inculcate a total commitment to safety and quality at every level of our company,” he said.

“The eyes of the world are on us, and I know we will come through this moment a better company, building on all the learnings we accumulated as we worked together to rebuild Boeing over the last number of years.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending