Connect with us

Aerospace

5 Horrible dreams on flight..!!

Two Airlines Narrowly Avoid Crashing.

Dreams…! are the successions of images, ideas, emotions and sensations that occur usually involuntarily in the mind during sleep.

Sometimes we usually think about what to dream? before we go to bed. But it may not happen to dream in the way we imagine. Because of the daily distractions like accidents, movies and sensible thoughts sometimes our dream becomes a breathtaking 3D horror movie without a director and a theatre.

This situation becomes horrible when we are above 35,000 ft over a sea. We bring here a few horrible dreams that you never dare to dream on flight..! So get ready to feel the dream…!

Advertisement

1. Hijacking:

This dream recalls the most terrifying incident of the world. Which is 2001, September 11 attack by Al-Qaeda-affliated extremists on twin towers of World Trade Centre USA. American Airlines Flight 11, United Airlines Flight 175, American Airlines Flight 77, United Airlines Flight 93, were hijacked on the morning on September 11 by Al-Qaeda-affliated extremists. Flight 11 and 175 were deliberately crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center, Flight 77 was crashed into the Pentagon and Flight 93 crashed into a field in Pennsylvania after hijackers crashed the plane due to a revolt by passengers. Both towers of The World Trade Center collapsed; in total 2,996 people, including the 19 hijackers, were killed and over 6000 people were injured. The attacks led to the War on terror.

Never dream of hijacking in today’s world. Security Industry flourished after the 9/11 attacks. After the incident need for security and its implementation was given the top priority.

Advertisement

Indian Airlines Flight 814

  • Indian Airlines Flight 814 commonly known as IC 814 was an Indian Airlines Airbus A300 en route from Tribhuvan International Airport in Kathmandu,Nepal to Indira Gandhi International Airport in Delhi, India on Friday, 24 December 1999, when it was hijacked. Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, a Pakistan-based Islamic extremist group, was accused of the hijacking.
  • Pan Am Flight 73, a Pan American World Airways Boeing 747-121, was hijacked on September 5, 1986, while on the ground at Karachi, Pakistan, by four armed Palestinian men of the Abu Nidal Organization.

Upgrading the security systems became the important measure for Airline Industry. Since the terrorist attacks occurred from hijacked airplanes, the airline industry had to establish new security measures to allow people to feel safe while flying. Immediately after the terrorist attack on the United States, President Bush provided twenty billion dollars for the upgrading of intelligence and security. These changes involved stricter background checks and the tougher security requirements on baggage checks.


2. Bird Strike:

Dreaming Bird strike and landing safely on water will bring back an incident occurred on January 15, 2009. Where US Airways Flight 1549 from LaGuardia to Charlotte/Douglas International Airport ditched into the Hudson River after experiencig a loss of both turbines. It is suspected that the engine failure was caused by running into a flock of geese at an altitude of about 975 m (3,200 feet), within short while after takeoff. All 150 passengers and 5 crew members were safely evacuated after a successful water landing.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) estimates bird strikes cost US aviation 400 million dollars annually and have resulted in over 200 worldwide deaths since 1988. Most bird strikes involve large birds with big populations, particularly geese and gulls in the United States of America. There are three major approaches to reduce the effect of bird strikes. The vehicles can be designed to be more bird resistant, the birds can be moved out of the way of the vehicle, or the vehicle can be moved out of the way of the birds.

Advertisement

There are many countermeasures taken by the authorities which includes Vehicle designing, Wildlife management like Visual repellents, auditory repellents, tactile repellents, Habitat manipulation, Reinforcement, Population control etc. and Flight path.


3. Landing gear failure:

Haven’t dream’t of Landing gear failure? There are successful landings without a landing gear..!! The most popular landing with undercarriage malfunction dates back to September 21, 2005.

Advertisement

JetBlue Airways Flight 292 was a scheduled flight from Bob Hope Airport in Burbank, California to John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City. On September 21, 2005, Captain Scott Burke executed an emergency landing the Airbus A320-200 at Los Angeles International Airport after the nose gear jammed in an abnormal position. No-one was injured.

Carrying 140 passengers and six crew, the Airbus A320-232 departed Burbank at 3:17 pmPDT (UTC-7). The aircraft, which was built in 2002, bore the tail number N536JB and the name “Canyon Blue”. It was scheduled to fly 2,465 miles (3,967 km) to John F. Kennedy International Airport.

Advertisement

pic courtesy : www.complex.com

pic courtesy : www.flismac.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IBx02FI7rk

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report says that worn-out seals were to blame for the malfunction, and that the Brake Steering Control Unit (BSCU) system contributed to the problem. The NTSB reported that Airbus had since upgraded the system to take care of the problem.


4. Mid-air Collision:

One of the deadliest dream one should ever have is the Mid-air Collision.  This dream will make us to remember the world’s deadliest mid-air collision which dates back to 12 November 1996, Charkhi Dadri mid-air collision.

Advertisement

The Charkhi Dadri mid-air collision occurred over the village of Charkhi Dadri, to the west of New Delhi, India. The aircraft involved were a Saudi Arabian Airlines Boeing 747-100B en route from Delhi to Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, and a Kazakhstan Airlines Ilyushin Il-76 en route from Chimkent, Kazakhstan, to Delhi. The crash killed all 349 people on board both planes, making it the world’s deadliest mid-air collision, the deadliest aviation accident to occur in India and the third-deadliest aircraft accident in the history of aviation, behind only the Tenerife airport disaster and Japan Airlines Flight 123.

In 2005, as part of an effort to reduce such military/civilian mid-air collisions in U.S. airspace, the Air National Guard Flight Safety Division, led by Lt Col Edward Vaughan, used the Disruptive Solutions Process to create the See and avoid web portal. In late 2006, the U.S. Defense Safety Oversight Council (DSOC) recognized and funded the site as its official civil/military midair collision prevention website, with participation by all the services.

Advertisement

5. Lightening strikes and turbulence:

Dreaming a lightning strike on our flight is heart-stopping situation where there are less chances of survival.

  • On December 8, 1963, Pan Am Flight 214, a Boeing 707, crashed near Elkton, Maryland while en route from Baltimoreto Philadelphia,  after being hit by lightning, killing all 81 on board.
  • LANSA Flight 508 [1959] (Fatalities: 6 crew + 85 passengers )About forty minutes after take-off, the aircraft entered a zone of strong turbulence and lightning. After flying for twenty minutes in this weather at FL210 lightning struck the aircraft, causing fire on the right wing which separated, along with part of the left wing. The aircraft crashed in flames into mountainous terrain
  • TWA Flight 891 was a Lockheed L-1649A Starliner that crashed not long after taking off from Milan Malpensa Airport on 26 June 1959. All 68 passengers and crew on board were killed.

Amateur video captured a lightning strike hitting a Delta Air Lines plane at the Atlanta airport.

Advertisement

(CNN)Lightning struck a Delta Air Lines plane in line for takeoff at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport on 20th August 2015 and it was all captured on amateur video. The recording shows rain drenching the airfield crowded with aircraft, waiting to take-off from the world’s busiest passenger airport. The lightning strikes the plane 18 seconds into the 36-second video.

Liked it ..!? 

Share with your friends and Family 

Advertisement

He is an aviation journalist and the founder of Jetline Marvel. Dawal gained a comprehensive understanding of the commercial aviation industry.  He has worked in a range of roles for more than 9 years in the aviation and aerospace industry. He has written more than 1700 articles in the aerospace industry. When he was 19 years old, he received a national award for his general innovations and holds the patent. He completed two postgraduate degrees simultaneously, one in Aerospace and the other in Management. Additionally, he authored nearly six textbooks on aviation and aerospace tailored for students in various educational institutions. jetlinem4(at)gmail.com

Advertisement

Aerospace

Which is bigger 777x or 787 aircraft ?

Which is bigger 777x or 787 aircraft ?

The 777X is a new series of the Boeing 777 family and is designed to be larger and more efficient than its predecessor. It features two variants: the 777-8 and the 777-9, being the larger of the two.

The Boeing 777X emerges as the larger sibling within the Boeing family, representing a significant leap forward in both size and efficiency. Comprising two variants, the 777-8 and the 777-9, the latter takes the crown as the larger of the two. With its expansive fuselage and impressive wingspan, the 777X is tailored for long-range journeys and boasts a substantial passenger capacity.

Advertisement

On the other hand, the Boeing 787, affectionately known as the Dreamliner, occupies a niche in the market as a smaller yet formidable aircraft designed for medium to long-range flights. Its distinguishing feature lies in its composite fuselage, a technological marvel that renders it lighter and more fuel-efficient compared to conventional aluminum counterparts. The Boeing 777X is larger than the Boeing 787 aircraft.

When it comes to passenger capacity, the 777-9 reigns supreme, typically accommodating a sizeable contingent of 400-425 passengers in its standard configuration. In contrast, the 787, with its more modest dimensions, typically carries between 240-290 passengers, depending on the variant and layout.

Advertisement

One of the remarkable innovations introduced with the 777X is its folding wingtips, a feature designed to address the logistical challenges of accommodating such a large aircraft in conventional airport gates. These folding wingtips enable the 777X to retract its wings, allowing it to fit into gates designed for smaller aircraft while still reaping the benefits of an extended wingspan during flight, thereby enhancing fuel efficiency and operational flexibility

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aerospace

China Secures Production Certificate for Mass Production of Pilotless eVTOL Aircraft

China Secures Production Certificate for Mass Production of Pilotless eVTOL Aircraft
EHang

The first passenger-carrying pilotless electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft in the world, the EH216-S, has received the Production Certificate for its eVTOL aircraft from the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC).

This is a significant milestone for EHang Holdings Limited, the leading UAM technology platform company in the world. This outstanding accomplishment is another big step towards mass manufacturing for the eVTOL aircraft and the ensuing commercial operations, building on the ground-breaking acquisition of the Type Certificate and the Standard Airworthiness Certificate for the EH216-S.

Advertisement

The PC is a crucial certificate that the aircraft maker receives from the CAAC, the country’s aviation authority. By obtaining this certificate, EHang has demonstrated that it has set up a quality management system for mass production that satisfies the airworthiness regulation standards set forth by the CAAC, and the company has been given permission to continue producing mass quantities.

It is also a strong guarantee of the calibre of the goods made by EHang. Raw materials, supplier management, manufacturing organisation, production quality control, aircraft pre-delivery test, after-sales repair and maintenance, etc. are all included in the mass production quality management system for the EH216-S.

Advertisement

To ensure that every aircraft and its components that roll off the production line strictly adhere to the approved type design and safety requirements, the system sets clear guidelines and documentation for every step in the production procedure. This ensures comprehensive traceability and safety control.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Aerospace

Four Airbus A380 Superjumbos lined up to be scrapped

EASA Proposes AD for Airbus A380 Wing Rib Foot Cracks

In a strategic move aimed at reclaiming valuable resources from the iconic Airbus A380 aircraft, VAS Aero Services and Dr. Peters Group have announced a significant collaboration.

This partnership marks a milestone in aviation logistics and aftermarket services, with four of these colossal planes slated for teardown and redistribution of used serviceable material (USM).

Advertisement

The venture between VAS Aero Services, renowned for its expertise in aircraft dismantlement, and Dr. Peters Group, a prominent Germany-based investment fund management firm, underscores a commitment to sustainable aviation practices. This isn’t their first foray into scrapping A380s; their successful partnership has already seen the dismantlement of these aircraft, making them pioneers in this niche.

Under the agreement, the latest consignment brings the tally to eight A380s entrusted to VAS by Dr. Peters Group. Managing Director Christian Mailly of Dr. Peters Group emphasized the trust placed in VAS, citing their unparalleled capabilities in dismantlement and aftermarket sales network. It’s a strategic move in response to the growing demand for quality USM parts, particularly with the resurgence in reliance on the A380.

Advertisement

Notably, the teardown process will be carried out at various locations, optimizing the positioning of harvested parts to cater to different markets. While some parts will be positioned in Europe to support operators in the region and the Middle East, others will remain in the Asia-Pacific region. This meticulous strategy ensures efficient access to spare parts, benefiting MROs and airlines across these markets.

The decision to retire these A380s comes at a time when operators are reassessing fleet strategies amidst evolving market dynamics. Despite initial plans for quick retirement due to the emergence of more fuel-efficient alternatives, factors such as a rebound in long-haul demand and delays in new widebody deliveries have prompted operators to reconsider. The A380, with its unique capacity and capabilities, presents a practical solution for short-term capacity management.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Advertisement

Trending